Quantum Fields and Bee Hives

.

Percolation smercolation. Tessellation of the Medium. Quantum Fields. Quantum Signals. A sea of word salad, but what does it mean?

I have been describing a new concept of energy transfer, using a new lexicon and different syntactic approach to physics, and understanding it. But, some may have difficulty understanding what I’m writing. What does the field look like? I recently cross posted an explanation for this on another forum. Here it is:

If you think of a planar cross section of the tessellated quantum field as it builds an energy pathway through space, it looks a bit like a beehive honeycomb, except that it is nested in an irreptile way. Quantum signals traverse the natural rings within that tessellated field (a tessellation is a “mesh” or “matrix” made of a like-geometry pattern, in this case a hexagon).

So one can easily visualize the self assembly of a tessellation of the medium through space, what some have in the past called aether, and what others now vaguely refer to as quantum foam. It is a lyotropic medium, which means it has latency for the dissolution of the self assembled paths, which are created by energy transit, in the same fashion as molecules “assembling” in normal classical physical chemistry.

The tessellation is why I say there are two speeds of light. The self assembly takes time, which is the limiter on the traditional speed of light C. When a very small (quantum) signal returns on this same path before its latency causes dissolution, then its speed is not limited by tessellation since the field is already tessellated. This return speed is almost instantaneous. This return speed is the until now unseen quantum signal of instantaneous action at a distance – what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance.

This very fast return speed is very useful to describe a lot of things. For instance, it is why scientists never found the quantum signal. Trying to find the quantum signal with equipment that operates at the slow speed of light, to find the movement of objects running at the fast speed of light is like using a very slow camera, with a very long shutter speed, to photograph fast action sports.

The players will seem to be in two (or many more) places at once. This is why science has made the master stroke error of assuming that quantum mechanics reveals that something can be in “two places at the same time”. Of course it LOOKS like that is the case, when looking at what is effectively a time lapse photo.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Quantum Signals?

So, I’ve spent a great deal of time morphing my thinking from what I thought a few years ago, into what I think today. I guess this is progress. I started out thinking that there were more substantial differences between what has been known and recognized for years (electromagnetic signals), and what I knew must certainly exist (quantum signals). Now my thinking has brought the two things closer together, while there are certainly still some differences remaining.

First, I stick by my original premise that nature’s mode of energy transit is longitudinal. This stems directly from the ideas that encapsulate the crystallography of mass medium, and my extension of it into space. This is Tesla’s view. However; this longitudinal force may cause propagation within refracted transverse paths, via the waveguides created by crystallographically defined percolation and the attendant self assembly of the medium.

So, here I want to make some generalizations about electromagnetic and quantum signals. By my definition, any signal that transits between quantum objects or “particles” is a quantum signal. So, this may take a directly percolative or a transverse path, or both. Here is a deviation from my thoughts some two or three years ago. I now see the longitudinal force as being the driver for the build-out of the self assembly, after which either type of signal may transit the resulting path. My definition puts a quantum signal on the scale of quantum objects, such that the signal typically covers the geometric spaces of objects on the nano and sub-nano scales.

At the center of the tessellation of the field (the self assembly), there is a substantial speed gain for quantum signals. But, from those signals there is also a more assured reflexive response from like-geometry objects to which the energy has transited. The velocity of the transit at the center of the field which “connects” quantum sized objects is (in my opinion) sufficient to beat the latency of the lyotropic medium. When this happens, the speed of the energy transit is no longer confined to the speed of the self assembly. Instead, it is dependent upon the equivalent of the “modulus of elasticity” for the medium. This velocity is much greater than the tessellation speed, (at least 10,000 times greater). It is this increased velocity which is responsible for the so-called “instantaneous action at a distance.”

All of this means that a quantum signal can travel at the speed of light C if the frequency of the originating or “carrier” signal is too low. It can travel at the speed of light C in the forward direction, but at the high velocity of light (>10000X) on the return path. And finally, it can travel at the high velocity of light in both directions on the second and subsequent transits.

There is another phenomenon which I intend to investigate in the near future. So far I have been postulating signal paths which are very direct, and considering only the originating signals. It seems that accompanying all of the original signals could be an overall field perturbation that might be called “quantum interference.” This field could be cause for some interesting (hologram-like) effects. Stay tuned.

One final comment. The percolative forces are related to the magnetic field. This is a position which I feel is boosted by the idea that the dipoles of magnetic materials are aligned in ways that would seem to be directly percolative paths. The dipole of a magnetic material is the essence of crystallography. The “electrical field” derives from the percolative magnetic one. So, there is really only one force.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Nature of the FTL Quantum Signal

 

So, there has been a progression in my thinking, as it pertains to the self assembling lyotropic medium, the refractive boundaries it creates, the irreptile nature of its crystallography, the speed of the tessellating (slow = C) light energy through the medium, and the speed of the energy on a built-path (first response and all subsequent, until decay).

What makes the wide-path/normal light speed so slow (velocity C) – is the fact that it is building out the self assembly of its tessellation as it goes. So, on any quantum circuit, the first forward stroke will be only at the slow speed of light C, and the following reflexive actions on the circuit will be at the fast speed of light (so far, best estimates are 10,000 * C). But, the reflexive responses occur only within the innermost regions of tessellation, because of the latency of the lyotropic medium (aether). These responses come only from those objects with geometries commensurate with the geometry of the inner tessellation, which means small things: atoms, molecules, photon. Quantum.

I have been calling the innermost signals “tiny waves” – but is that really the best description? Since the period / wavelength of a wave is measured against time, when the wave transit time is almost nil, the wave is delivered in pieces. In such a case, the endpoints still seem to have the characteristics of a wave: it’s just that it is delivered almost instantaneously. The pieces are seen as pulses, when compared to the time base of the slow wave. Relative to the endpoints of the connection, the wave is delivered a tiny piece at a time, making it seem like there is instantaneous synchronization.

This piecemeal delivery of the quantum state was of course undetectable to the likes of Einstein, Bohr and the various people who performed the experiments involving quantum entanglement. It would be as a series of “bullets” – almost – when viewed on the slow-as-molasses speed (C) of ordinary transverse waves using on-the-fly tessellation build-out for the waveguide.

In between the endpoints, the wave seems very longitudinal, if looked at while holding a time reference of slow light C. This longitudinality keeps the conservation of energy laws happy. But the effect on each endpoint is to reproduce the original wave, with quantum sizing, but opposite phase. The endpoints will be 180 degrees out of phase, interacting with a mechanism similar to the Wilberforce pendulum, but with a twist.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests

There are TWO Speeds of Light

Intrinsic to my postulations about light speed, tessellation, and self assembly is the idea that light has two speeds – a slow speed (C), and a very fast speed (nearly instantaneous).

There are two “speeds of light.” One is the tessellation speed of the medium’s crystallographically defined self assembly. The other is the light momentum’s speed associated with the “modulus of elasticity” for the medium. Of course the assembly of the tessellating structure is slow by comparison to the travel of light over a built path. So, the slow speed of light is the tessellation speed.

The built path is not maintained for the large transverse wave. Hence, there is no return of signal for the large transverse waves. By large, I mean the traditionally measured wavelengths such as 532 nanometers for green. However; the center of tessellation is capable of receiving the reflexive light from a connected photon. This means that for the center of tessellation, the speed of light is almost instantaneous.

The speed of tesselation is slow and is what governs the traditional constant for the speed of light. The modulus of elasticity for the built path is cause for the “fast” speed of light, which is nearly instantaneous on a built path.

The equalizer for the traditional speed of light being constant is the tessellation speed. So, light is bi-speed. Two speed light explains the strong and weak forces. The elasticity of the longer lasting built path of tessellation is stronger than the unmaintained elasticity of the medium in general. So, the strong force is elasticity built from entanglement force.

By the way, the weaker elasticity of the general medium is an explanation for gravity.  Gravity does not shape time space.  It shapes the medium, and that medium’s elasticity becomes the force.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests