Percolation Builds a Tessellated Waveguide

 

Figure 1: I usually make my own graphics, but today I’m lazy and have used a CC share. It’s probably better than what I would have drawn 🙂 .

Quantum percolation builds a tessellated waveguide in aether. It stops expanding when, due to the cyclic nature of the source, it “runs out of time”, and so it exactly corresponds to the geometry of the wavelength of the energy.  Partial tessellation occurs in both the whole field associated with the wavelength,  and the individual self assembled percolation paths of atom-level energy transits.  The former builds a waveguide for the specific wavelength of the transverse wave, while the latter drives quantum entanglement.  The former is refracted transverse energy momentum, while the latter is longitudinal and angular-momentum driven by percolation. It is important to note that the transverse waves themselves are constituted from longitudinal percolation paths. The difference is that refracted transverse waves are less likely to engage in the Wilburforce pendulum effect associated with a single atom or photon.

Quantum entanglement happens when the transmitter is particularly matched to the aether’s crystallography.  This happens best when the crystallography of the transmitter is a hexagonal crystal. The outer boundary of the tessellation confines refracted transverse energy momentum, while entanglement is caused by longitudinal and angular-momentum driven by percolations at the exact geometry of the atoms involved (or photons).

For a couple years, I have pondered the mechanism that connects the percolation paths that drive atoms at the nano level, with the outer geometries of the transverse wave that results from the self assembling percolation crystallography.  Then I stumbled upon the partially tessellated hexagon geometry (written up in Mathematics Magazine some years ago).  It’s irreptile self similar assembly, and now makes the theory internally consistent.

The partial tessellation is very important, because it creates a very strong refractive discontinuity to build the waveguide (like an impedance boundary in electrical speak).  At the nano scale, the tessellation is confined to the longitudinal moments driven with angular momentum as a result of the percolation paths of the crysallographically defined network topology of the aether.  This aether is what some are starting to call a quantum field.  But, it’s just crystallography, like lattices built of arrangements of atoms.  So, mass is intrinsically connected to energy transit paths that are simply an extension of the crystallography into “space”.

Why would we ever have conceived of a different picture than this?  It extends the *real* nature of our environment in a very localized way, devoid of multiple universes and extended dimensions and projections of this or that, or holographic nonsense. It’s very concrete, and very Tesla-like. A quantum signal, a reciprocating signal responsible for quantum entanglement, is a longitudinal percolation with angular momentum. Its cascade of tessellation enlarges to exactly match the atom or photon with which it entangles.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Advertisement

Why Light Never Stands Still

There is the old saying that rust never sleeps.  Well, light never stops.  In the atomist’s viewpoint of the world, there is not really a pat answer for why light ceaselessly moves.  But, to an aetherist, it’s a simple thing to understand.  To the aetherist, all the universe is a 3D fabric of aether, with elastic movements within it.  These movements started with the big bang, and continue to this day.  All that ever happens is that the elastic bumps within the aether medium shift around from one place to another.  They are always conserved, and the total universe is always in equilibrium.

The movements of light in the aether are thumps on the structure of the aether, and once those momentum movements have been instigated by a shove on a granule of the aether (a “granule” is what J. Yee calls the smallest elemental piece of the aether fabric) – then there is a corresponding movement (really a momentum transfer) to the other side of the granule.  The movements are not continuous movements, but instead a bump-bump-bump type of transfer.

Light that doesn’t move, by definition, doesn’t exist

When two opposing bumps collide, there is a bigger deformation of a single granule, but all of the energy of that collision is released back onto adjacent granules, because the aether absorbs nothing in the collision that it does not immediately release in the same form.  It is perfectly elastic.  Such an elastic return of the condition of the mesh will happen unless the first bump is immediately followed by a second bump, so the bigger deformations that are seen are a kind of slight of hand.  The light keeps moving.

This is different than is the case with matter, where the collisions are not perfectly elastic.  Matter can keep its deformations, and matter can stop (at least relativistically).

The light (which is a bump/ which is energy/ which is momentum) never stops.  If light were ever to stop, it would not be elastically deforming the aether, and so the bump that is the representation of light would not any longer exist.  The light would disappear from the universe.  That doesn’t happen, because the energy (of the pseudo-movement of the transfer of momentum) is always conserved.  It just goes somewhere else, instead of disappearing.  This is because the aether itself absorbs no energy that is not immediately released again.

This happens because we have defined the light to be a bump on the aether.  But, we mean by that statement that light is a transfer within the aether.  It is a bump-bump-bump style of movement. It is momentum transfer.  So, by definition, we say that light is movement (in bits), and light that doesn’t move, by definition, doesn’t exist.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.