Energy Propagation and Irreptile Geometry


All energy propagation involves the irreptile self-similar inward assembly of a triangular/hexagonal repeating geometry of nodes in the aether.  It may be that Lee Sallows deserves a Nobel prize in Physics/Mathematics for observations he made in the realm of tessellation and irreptile geometries (infinitely nested hexagons, with a few leftover triangles (that make it technically an incomplete tessellation). He has nothing to do with me or my sites. He does not know me, nor I him. He might not agree with my postulations and (some call crazily esoteric) rants about physics.  If he knew me, he might think I’m a nut.  But, his observation (published in Mathematics Magazine) was the last nail I needed to build out my theory on the lyotropic aether. Technically, the self similar, inwardly repeating geometry is not irreptile tessellation because the initial tiling leaves gaps. However; it IS infinitely self nesting. That’s all that is needed.

I needed something to make the “body” of the Wilburforce Pendulum. In my mind I saw the filaments of self-assembled lyotropic aether, but needed those to act collectively to produce the alternating rotations of the Wilburforce pendulum. Lee has provided the critical piece of information needed to make the whole assembly reasonably feasible.  I had initially thought that the effects of “bunching” and “pinching” could explain the pendulum, but those are nebulous terms.  Irreptile assemblies do have the strength to hold up the theory, perhaps.  Incomplete hexagonal tessellations seem to play well with my most recent thoughts connecting general energy propagation to quantum entanglement and crystallographically defined percolations. We are NOT talking about waves here.  Nothing in this post is about waves.  It’s all about longitudinal percolations with angular momentum, at an atomic scale many magnitudes below an atom.  The reason I needed an aggregator such as bunching, pinching, or self similarity is that a single  filament of self assembled lyotropic aether could not drive an atom by itself.  It needs to be bunched by at least 1 order of magnitude (more on that later).

Did you ever wonder why DC current does not produce radio waves? I have.  To the regular electrician or engineer such a statement falls into the category of stuff involving a suspension of disbelief, or pseudo science. But, force is force, so why does it need to alternate in order to propagate across the expanses of the spaces around us?  No reason understood, until now.  Thanks Lee.   

The Wilburforce pendulum is a phase shifting device.  One end of the pendulum circuit is always 180 degrees out of phase with the other, just as in quantum entanglement.  Without the phase shift, it doesn’t work.  Either an alternating current drives the phase shift in a single-ended way, or equal and opposite reflexes allow the pendulum to work in a free style way.  One might say that the pendulum causes its own phase shift by the nature of its construction.  This is true, but only works when the connection is at parity on both ends (a strong response exists, coming from the other end of the propagation circuit).   Else, the pendulum would either get stuck at 180 degrees or rotate in one direction, breaking the nodes of the transit path to the receiver.  The receiver must connect in a node-to-node percolation manner, not breaking the “spring” of the pendulum.  Not all connections are entangled ones, but when there is a quantum entangled connection, there is enough response from the other end of the circuit to make the pendulum work in a free style way. 

This is a bit of a modification of what I recently postulated as the cause for rotation in the Wilberforce pendulum.  Most of what I stated about that aspect of propagation (that the crystal always starts the rotation in the same direction), I think is still valid.  Most transfer is heavily one-ended, but in the case of quantum entanglement, where the efficiency is so much greater (due to the hexagonal crystals used as transmitters) – the other end of the connection is sufficiently synchronized to act as a true free space Wilburforce pendulum.  Without the quantum entanglement, the propagation is a sort of half Wilburforce pendulum, a bit like a half wave rectifier circuit.  The difference between regular energy propagation and quantum entanglement is simply efficiency.

Due to the added efficiency, the quantum entangled connection is a fully operational free space Wilburforce pendulum, while regular propagation is driven in a mostly single-ended way, helped by the phase shift of the source to compensate for the lack of response from the other end.  In the case of the entangled connection, there is much higher reciprocity, and synchronization.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.



The Aether’s Right Hand Rule


We have one rule to guide them all: the aether’s right hand rule. Over the past several years, I have posited a number of things about the aether, and its attributes and properties, how it propagates light, and other things. I started with the idea of a lyotropic aether (one that can dissolve and reform) – giving it the “structure” of a liquid crystal when undergoing the impact of a moment of light, where the aether self-structures and self assembles along the trajectory of a ray of light. 

I made this model fit primarily with the observed behavior of entangled photons, which seemed to indicate that the self-structured aether must support angular momentum.  I then observed a possible analog to the mechanism which must support angular momentum, in the form of the Wilburforce pendulum.  But, in all of this, I could give no good reason for the torsion (rotation) to exist, because my model assumed a straight forward hexagonal crystallography would sufficiently define the aether.

I thought of many things that could drive the rotation, but all of them failed the basic test of trajectory reversal. For instance, the universe has a spin itself, as it spirals outward and expands.  But this force exerts an outside influence, which fails when the trajectory direction is reversed.  I realized that whatever explained the right hand rule (at a deep physics level, not electrical theory level) – would also explain the rotation of the aether energy propagation.

Then it struck me: it’s not an outside influence, it’s an inside one.  The rotation has to do with the crystallography of the aether itself.  It’s a non-linear crystal! Non-linear crystals can be bifringent, meaning they can support multiple network node topologies simultaneously.  Such crystals have short paths and long paths (node to node).  This difference makes non-linear crystals asymmetric, and the asymmetry promotes a spin in the direction of the long-path percolations. Note we are talking about longitudinal percolations here, and not waves.

The reader may interject that this idea also suffers from the reversal problem, but it does not.  Because it is the light itself that initiates the self propagation, and self assembly, it is that light that sets the initial angular momentum (“direction”) – entirely based upon the crystallography of the built path as it is built, which is always the same, regardless of whether there is a “reversal” or change in orientation.

Since the self-building energy paths always take a lopsided-ness based on trajectory, all rotation is W.R.T. that trajectory.  This asymmetry is born of the longer path that one “node-set” traversal takes as compared to the shorter path opposite of it. The longer path loads more energy, and therefore puts torsion on the transit pathway, and the energy flowing through it.  The angular momentum will always be with respect to the trajectory, and therefore can explain the right hand rule.

For the purposes of generating an aether echo-device (Wilburforce pendulum) entanglement scenario, a magic angle of 1.1 degrees seems to be needed, or at least is very much an efficiency boosting factor for the entanglement.  This is in agreement with the idea of a staggered-structure, self-assembling aether,  because a perfectly linear lattice would tend to rotate in either direction.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests


Atoms are Nested Super Lattice Spheres

Today I’m going to write down a bullet-pointed list of some recent thoughts, and try not to bring along any chaff …

  • Atoms are nested superlattice spheres. Each so-called orbital shell is a different geometry within the superlattice. Some geometries are more efficient (hence they hold more energy). Some of these superlattices are self-similar, resolving to ever smaller geometries, which is why they hold so much energy in spite of their size. It’s because the energy network is so large. An atom is really more like a capacitor or battery than it is like the thing that academia has painted for it.
  • There is no such thing as positive electric charge.  Other than as an abstraction, we could consider that there is no such thing as charge polarity: and instead there is only the presence or the absence of energy, and the direction of its flow. The polarity abstraction has served to conflate it with something that is real, when it is not.
  • All energy is initially scalar.  Tesla was correct.  But, due to the lyotropic aether, the scalar energy is channelized along percolation paths.  Due to the channelization, the individual scalar “rays” each have a vector, and can transform to refracted T-waves.
  • All energy momentum transit is a longitudinal percolation.  Longitudinal percolation creates a superlattice in lyotropic aether, which aligns the lyotropic aether, creating an impedance/aether discontinuity along the medium boundary of the superlattice.  This supports refraction for the secondary T-wave.
  • Nature’s mode is longitudinal, as in previous bullet point.  
  • Gravity is unrefracted energy percolation, coming from the surrounding universe. It is scalar in effect, even though the energy passes through myriad percolation channels in lyotropic aether.

I should explain the assertion that there are no charges – at least a little bit. We’ve had charge terminology wrong since Benjamin Franklin guessed that the electrified clouds were negative and the ground positive. Of course, it’s really the opposite of that, but my point doesn’t have anything to do with positive being negative.

Energy is energy. It doesn’t itself have any polarity. It’s just a stress-force momentum in the aether. So, we really only have one thing, or we don’t have it. We have energy, or we don’t. Dipoles have reflexive polarity, but this polarity is “having energy” versus “not having energy” – so we have only positive “energy” (we call it negative, thanks to Franklin) – and then on the other side of the dipole we have “no energy” (or more likely “lesser” energy) – and we call it negative polarity.  The idea of a center voltage of zero is simply a convention built out of the way they decided to build power transformers, with center taps.  It’s entirely artificial, and nature doesn’t really have +/- charges in it.  It has energy, and alternately, no or lesser energy.  Like water, energy flows from where it is to where it isn’t.

The vast majority of the energy in the universe is of the scalar form, albeit it comes with the overlay of the channelization effects of lyotropic aether percolation.  We see none of it, because nothing akin to “charge” appears to us except when there is an interaction with mass that results in what we perceive (or our instruments perceive) as charge.

Nonetheless, unrefracted percolated (scalar) energy has an impact on individual atoms with its force, even as it does not affect the so-called “charge” exhibited by those atoms. So, it ends up being an undetected mechanical force that is responsible for gravity.

How do we detect this energy? We have a number of means to measure the effects of gravity, but how do we more closely measure the gravity itself?  Unrefracted energy percolation is responsible for so-called quantum entanglement.  So, a device that measures how much quantum entanglement happens per unit area (say, by measuring the quantum echoes between two quantum lenses) – we might more directly measure the “gravity”.  A candidate material for the lenses would be, of course, graphene.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.