Gamma Photons: Always Quantum Entangled

 

Photons from radioactive elements are always seen to be quantum entangled. A simple entanglement detector made with a cesium disk and an old geiger counter tube shows every photon to be entangled. I have not built up this sort of apparatus myself, but it is a simple university level experiment, documented elsewhere.

Why?

If you believe in and understand the theory I espouse, which implies a medium with a lyotropic nature, which imparts a certain crystallographically defined effect on energy transfer, then the explanation is simple.

The amplitude (geometrically speaking) of a light wave is constrained by its period. You don’t often see this stated, but it is true. Materials such as cesium emit gamma r@ys. The gamma energy is constrained to the geometric spaces near the center of tessellation of the self assembling medium. This means that more of the energy in a gamma r@y is at the geometry of quantum objects. It is more likely to build a self-sustaining path in a lyotropic medium with a finite latency. It is more likely that there is a reflex signal returned along the path, to continue the entanglement of the quantum objects involved.

The purist will submit that all photons from a single quantum source are entangled. This is true, but it happens during the energy initiation while photons are still scalar. When considering normal (light-range) photons, in an imperceptible moment of time those all become vectorized by the medium and are no longer scalar.

With normal light waves, the source is usually not configured to present an efficient match to the lyotropic medium. The random angles and timings of normal incoherent light subscribe to an “impedance mismatch” with the medium itself. Less of the light is aggregated within the path of the center of tessellation. The angles are all-important. That is why the magic anle of 1.1 degrees works so well, and is also why the hexagonal crystallography is twice as entanglement efficient as any other crystallography.

When you get into it, you realize there is not much difference between quantum entangled or half-cycle quantum connections – and coherent (but unentangled / slow) “normal” transverse waves with a very small waveform.  The main difference is speed (C versus instantaneous).  It becomes a much less mysterious thing.

More on this later …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Nature of the FTL Quantum Signal

 

So, there has been a progression in my thinking, as it pertains to the self assembling lyotropic medium, the refractive boundaries it creates, the irreptile nature of its crystallography, the speed of the tessellating (slow = C) light energy through the medium, and the speed of the energy on a built-path (first response and all subsequent, until decay).

What makes the wide-path/normal light speed so slow (velocity C) – is the fact that it is building out the self assembly of its tessellation as it goes. So, on any quantum circuit, the first forward stroke will be only at the slow speed of light C, and the following reflexive actions on the circuit will be at the fast speed of light (so far, best estimates are 10,000 * C). But, the reflexive responses occur only within the innermost regions of tessellation, because of the latency of the lyotropic medium (aether). These responses come only from those objects with geometries commensurate with the geometry of the inner tessellation, which means small things: atoms, molecules, photon. Quantum.

I have been calling the innermost signals “tiny waves” – but is that really the best description? Since the period / wavelength of a wave is measured against time, when the wave transit time is almost nil, the wave is delivered in pieces. In such a case, the endpoints still seem to have the characteristics of a wave: it’s just that it is delivered almost instantaneously. The pieces are seen as pulses, when compared to the time base of the slow wave. Relative to the endpoints of the connection, the wave is delivered a tiny piece at a time, making it seem like there is instantaneous synchronization.

This piecemeal delivery of the quantum state was of course undetectable to the likes of Einstein, Bohr and the various people who performed the experiments involving quantum entanglement. It would be as a series of “bullets” – almost – when viewed on the slow-as-molasses speed (C) of ordinary transverse waves using on-the-fly tessellation build-out for the waveguide.

In between the endpoints, the wave seems very longitudinal, if looked at while holding a time reference of slow light C. This longitudinality keeps the conservation of energy laws happy. But the effect on each endpoint is to reproduce the original wave, with quantum sizing, but opposite phase. The endpoints will be 180 degrees out of phase, interacting with a mechanism similar to the Wilberforce pendulum, but with a twist.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests