Atoms are Nested Super Lattice Spheres

Today I’m going to write down a bullet-pointed list of some recent thoughts, and try not to bring along any chaff …

  • Atoms are nested superlattice spheres. Each so-called orbital shell is a different geometry within the superlattice. Some geometries are more efficient (hence they hold more energy). Some of these superlattices are self-similar, resolving to ever smaller geometries, which is why they hold so much energy in spite of their size. It’s because the energy network is so large. An atom is really more like a capacitor or battery than it is like the thing that academia has painted for it.
  • There is no such thing as positive electric charge.  Other than as an abstraction, we could consider that there is no such thing as charge polarity: and instead there is only the presence or the absence of energy, and the direction of its flow. The polarity abstraction has served to conflate it with something that is real, when it is not.
  • All energy is initially scalar.  Tesla was correct.  But, due to the lyotropic aether, the scalar energy is channelized along percolation paths.  Due to the channelization, the individual scalar “rays” each have a vector, and can transform to refracted T-waves.
  • All energy momentum transit is a longitudinal percolation.  Longitudinal percolation creates a superlattice in lyotropic aether, which aligns the lyotropic aether, creating an impedance/aether discontinuity along the medium boundary of the superlattice.  This supports refraction for the secondary T-wave.
  • Nature’s mode is longitudinal, as in previous bullet point.  
  • Gravity is unrefracted energy percolation, coming from the surrounding universe. It is scalar in effect, even though the energy passes through myriad percolation channels in lyotropic aether.

I should explain the assertion that there are no charges – at least a little bit. We’ve had charge terminology wrong since Benjamin Franklin guessed that the electrified clouds were negative and the ground positive. Of course, it’s really the opposite of that, but my point doesn’t have anything to do with positive being negative.

Energy is energy. It doesn’t itself have any polarity. It’s just a stress-force momentum in the aether. So, we really only have one thing, or we don’t have it. We have energy, or we don’t. Dipoles have reflexive polarity, but this polarity is “having energy” versus “not having energy” – so we have only positive “energy” (we call it negative, thanks to Franklin) – and then on the other side of the dipole we have “no energy” (or more likely “lesser” energy) – and we call it negative polarity.  The idea of a center voltage of zero is simply a convention built out of the way they decided to build power transformers, with center taps.  It’s entirely artificial, and nature doesn’t really have +/- charges in it.  It has energy, and alternately, no or lesser energy.  Like water, energy flows from where it is to where it isn’t.

The vast majority of the energy in the universe is of the scalar form, albeit it comes with the overlay of the channelization effects of lyotropic aether percolation.  We see none of it, because nothing akin to “charge” appears to us except when there is an interaction with mass that results in what we perceive (or our instruments perceive) as charge.

Nonetheless, unrefracted percolated (scalar) energy has an impact on individual atoms with its force, even as it does not affect the so-called “charge” exhibited by those atoms. So, it ends up being an undetected mechanical force that is responsible for gravity.

How do we detect this energy? We have a number of means to measure the effects of gravity, but how do we more closely measure the gravity itself?  Unrefracted energy percolation is responsible for so-called quantum entanglement.  So, a device that measures how much quantum entanglement happens per unit area (say, by measuring the quantum echoes between two quantum lenses) – we might more directly measure the “gravity”.  A candidate material for the lenses would be, of course, graphene.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Percolation is Longitudinal, with a Twist

I have been covering the magic angle of superconducting and entanglement generating gr@phene in the past few posts. The magic angle, which is 1.1 degrees, is the same for superconduction as it is for entanglement generation. This puts the two phenomenon (entanglement and superconduction) on par with one another, meaning that both are classically driven mechanisms. If superconduction can be described classically, then by virtue of the common magic angle, so too can entanglement be described classically.

There is a pun in the title.

For whatever reason, aether percolation requires a 1.1 degree entry angle. The dipole moments of the originating crystal must be directing the flow of energy, but that direction (for whatever reason) needs to be biased with a slightly non-linear flow in order to induce self assembly and propagation in lyotropic aether. So, the energy becomes a tight spiral or “vortex” of percolating moments of energy-momentum in the aether.  The natural mode of this vortex is in longitudinal moments of energy, but these longitudinal moments are induced to have a very slight boucing action inside of the waveguide of the originating crystal lattice, and subsequently of the lyotropic aether.  

It is the idea of aether-scale/ atomic scale percolation that is responsible for the seeming invisibility of the energy forces that connect entangled objects.  Most lab measurement devices depend on the “human scale” macro world measurement schemes of charge, voltage, current, and such, which require a build-up of many energy moments in order to be detected at all.  The tiny circuit flows of lyotropic aether traces or filaments are undetected by lab devices built to measure built-up charges and transverse waves.

The transverse waves we normally detect with conventional equipment are directed by the waveguide of the larger cross-section of bunched filaments in the aether, as compared to a single filament, due to the well-known pinch effect and the tendency for bunching to occur within many closely-packed traces of percolating energy.  Inner vortexes tend to pull outer ones along, until a (human scale) tranverse wave can be guided by the composite alignments.  Most of the energy is tranferred by the secondary wave (the transverse wave) because the magic angle restricts the direct-flow energy to a few moments (we may call them “photons”) that are in alignment with the crystal – while the balance of the energy is transferred via the waveguide effect and the resulting transverse form. The waveguide mechanism is refraction, which creates a so-called discontinuity in the aether, and supports the transverse flow of energy. This discontinuity is directly analogous to the discontinuity that exists at the ends of resonant antennas.

Note that the base mode for propagation in the outer-band refracted transverse wave is also longitudinal, consisting of many refracted slow-c (amorphous-like) filaments whose energy is in the form of native longitudinal force. It is the larger waveguide of the composite, rather than the singular waveguide of the aether trace, that guides the transverse wave.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.