Quantum Entanglement: Unifying Theory

An analysis of the mechanics of quantum entanglement yields an understanding of our physical universe. Building a theory around the real way that photons, atoms, and molecules entangle simultaneously solves the riddle of the quantum leap, of electron theory, of the real nature of the so-called weak and strong forces, and of quarks. This is not an exhaustive list. An understanding of QE is a logarithmic leap of knowledge.

Tesla was partially correct. In his view, all energy transfer is scalar and longitudinal. It is scalar and longitudinal, absent the effects of a crystallographically defined universe, containing a lyotropic aether. Once those effects are factored into the thought process, energy transfer becomes a composite mechanism, with the primary force building out the self assembling structure of lyotropic aether, longitudinally via percolation, and a secondary force which is really of the same kind – but that is confined to a waveguide created by the primary force.

Thus, energy (and its attendant self assembled lyotropic aether) – reflects energy (and its attendant lyotropic aether). This is why you cannot build the motive force components of an electric motor with plastic. Metals create a laminar flow of energy, which builds out a crystallograpically defined field (of lyotropic aether) – and this facilitates an ordered energy field that can reflect other energies.

My detractors might say that I’ve never defined the lyotropic aether itself, excepting for the fact (my opinion actually) – that it’s lyotropic. A days work in a day, I say. There’s more to discover. Getting back to the motive components of the electric motor, we say that laminar, contiguous energy flow creates a refraction and reflection point for other energy flow. Think about the atom, which is mostly nothing excepting for its extremely dense nucleus. So, it’s not the nothingness that reflects energy flow, it’s the energy that resides in that nothingness. Even the nothingness is not really that – since the lyotropic aether pervades that space as well as all others.

What the flow of energy in the electric motor does is to build out a self assembled crystallographically defined field around itself. Subsequent force vectors introduced into the field are refracted and reflected from the aligned energies of the motive components – which may be mostly a surface effect. This applies to directed currents, whether or not they are in the form of a coil. Energy flow even in DC currents in straight wires builds out a crystallographically defined field about itself. The involvement of refraction and reflection explains why the skin effect is what it is. A magnetic field (static) is built by self assembly. An electrical field is also created within self assembled fields, crystallographically defined.

Looking at quantum entanglement, it is obvious (at least to me) – that it is a crystallographically defined phenomenon. The magic angle of 1.1 degrees that is often used with hexagonal crystals to entangle quantum objects (atoms, molecules, and photons) – implies very strongly that quantum entanglement is crystallographically defined, and so from this starting point we begin to unravel the secrets of the quantum entanglement itself, but of energy in general.

The nice thing about crystallographically defined theories is that they are real. The mass structure explorations of Linus Pauling were of real things, of the elements, and of that which we see all around us. This is a nice upgrade from the idea that so-called non-locality, connected to parallel universes, is at play. I like my nascent theory much more than the latter, because it’s obviously of the real realm of things. In the words of the scientist, classical. There is only classical physics, IMO, and the others are mirage.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Advertisement

Quantum Leaps: Really?

 

I have been thinking about the crystallographic world of Linus Pauling, and how the extension of it to universal space could so intuitively connect everything in our universe with the simple and straightforward rules of geometry. I’ve realized, recently, that embracing such a thing as a crystallographic universe eliminates the idea of the quantum leap.

Since when has the universe been comprised of step functions and digital-like rhythms? Our world is an analog world, for the most part. Why should the internals of an atom be any different? A quantum leap is a step function with no leading or trailing edges. It is something that miraculously pops into and out of existence, to use their terminology. My terminology for this is best described by “suspension of disbelief required.”

Do we really have strong and weak nuclear forces? Gravity is but one force, dependent upon mass. When you are far from earth you are not that much affected by its gravity, and when you are on its surface you are made tired by the end of the day because of it. Scientists would contend that there are two nuclear forces because the strong force seems not to be a linear extension of the weak force. Its intensity relates to a different “constant” than the strong force.

But, there are other possibilities that might explain the difference in the intensity of forces, and why the so-called strong force seems to be of such a limited a range. One such possibility can be seen in light of a crystallographic definition of the universe and its forces. This thought comes to me by way of the idea of a tessellated tetrahedron atom. When such an irreptile infinitesimal- limit-approaching imprint is made upon the structure of an atom, it would cause an exponentiation of the factors governing the forces. Combining that with the fact that the tessellation of tetrahedrons is not complete, and a step function of force might be introduced by the non-uniform mapping of such force due to dis-similarities or discontinuities in the incomplete tessellation.

So far as the quantum leap is concerned, it could be replaced by a contiguous and linear flow of energy via percolation. For ideas about percolation, see some of my more recent posts. Things don’t pop into an out of existence, but instead flow via a percolation that is unobserved because it is unsought.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Percolation Builds a Tessellated Waveguide

 

Figure 1: I usually make my own graphics, but today I’m lazy and have used a CC share. It’s probably better than what I would have drawn 🙂 .

Quantum percolation builds a tessellated waveguide in aether. It stops expanding when, due to the cyclic nature of the source, it “runs out of time”, and so it exactly corresponds to the geometry of the wavelength of the energy.  Partial tessellation occurs in both the whole field associated with the wavelength,  and the individual self assembled percolation paths of atom-level energy transits.  The former builds a waveguide for the specific wavelength of the transverse wave, while the latter drives quantum entanglement.  The former is refracted transverse energy momentum, while the latter is longitudinal and angular-momentum driven by percolation. It is important to note that the transverse waves themselves are constituted from longitudinal percolation paths. The difference is that refracted transverse waves are less likely to engage in the Wilburforce pendulum effect associated with a single atom or photon.

Quantum entanglement happens when the transmitter is particularly matched to the aether’s crystallography.  This happens best when the crystallography of the transmitter is a hexagonal crystal. The outer boundary of the tessellation confines refracted transverse energy momentum, while entanglement is caused by longitudinal and angular-momentum driven by percolations at the exact geometry of the atoms involved (or photons).

For a couple years, I have pondered the mechanism that connects the percolation paths that drive atoms at the nano level, with the outer geometries of the transverse wave that results from the self assembling percolation crystallography.  Then I stumbled upon the partially tessellated hexagon geometry (written up in Mathematics Magazine some years ago).  It’s irreptile self similar assembly, and now makes the theory internally consistent.

The partial tessellation is very important, because it creates a very strong refractive discontinuity to build the waveguide (like an impedance boundary in electrical speak).  At the nano scale, the tessellation is confined to the longitudinal moments driven with angular momentum as a result of the percolation paths of the crysallographically defined network topology of the aether.  This aether is what some are starting to call a quantum field.  But, it’s just crystallography, like lattices built of arrangements of atoms.  So, mass is intrinsically connected to energy transit paths that are simply an extension of the crystallography into “space”.

Why would we ever have conceived of a different picture than this?  It extends the *real* nature of our environment in a very localized way, devoid of multiple universes and extended dimensions and projections of this or that, or holographic nonsense. It’s very concrete, and very Tesla-like. A quantum signal, a reciprocating signal responsible for quantum entanglement, is a longitudinal percolation with angular momentum. Its cascade of tessellation enlarges to exactly match the atom or photon with which it entangles.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Energy Propagation and Irreptile Geometry

 

All energy propagation involves the irreptile self-similar inward assembly of a triangular/hexagonal repeating geometry of nodes in the aether.  It may be that Lee Sallows deserves a Nobel prize in Physics/Mathematics for observations he made in the realm of tessellation and irreptile geometries (infinitely nested hexagons, with a few leftover triangles (that make it technically an incomplete tessellation). He has nothing to do with me or my sites. He does not know me, nor I him. He might not agree with my postulations and (some call crazily esoteric) rants about physics.  If he knew me, he might think I’m a nut.  But, his observation (published in Mathematics Magazine) was the last nail I needed to build out my theory on the lyotropic aether. Technically, the self similar, inwardly repeating geometry is not irreptile tessellation because the initial tiling leaves gaps. However; it IS infinitely self nesting. That’s all that is needed.

I needed something to make the “body” of the Wilburforce Pendulum. In my mind I saw the filaments of self-assembled lyotropic aether, but needed those to act collectively to produce the alternating rotations of the Wilburforce pendulum. Lee has provided the critical piece of information needed to make the whole assembly reasonably feasible.  I had initially thought that the effects of “bunching” and “pinching” could explain the pendulum, but those are nebulous terms.  Irreptile assemblies do have the strength to hold up the theory, perhaps.  Incomplete hexagonal tessellations seem to play well with my most recent thoughts connecting general energy propagation to quantum entanglement and crystallographically defined percolations. We are NOT talking about waves here.  Nothing in this post is about waves.  It’s all about longitudinal percolations with angular momentum, at an atomic scale many magnitudes below an atom.  The reason I needed an aggregator such as bunching, pinching, or self similarity is that a single  filament of self assembled lyotropic aether could not drive an atom by itself.  It needs to be bunched by at least 1 order of magnitude (more on that later).

Did you ever wonder why DC current does not produce radio waves? I have.  To the regular electrician or engineer such a statement falls into the category of stuff involving a suspension of disbelief, or pseudo science. But, force is force, so why does it need to alternate in order to propagate across the expanses of the spaces around us?  No reason understood, until now.  Thanks Lee.   

The Wilburforce pendulum is a phase shifting device.  One end of the pendulum circuit is always 180 degrees out of phase with the other, just as in quantum entanglement.  Without the phase shift, it doesn’t work.  Either an alternating current drives the phase shift in a single-ended way, or equal and opposite reflexes allow the pendulum to work in a free style way.  One might say that the pendulum causes its own phase shift by the nature of its construction.  This is true, but only works when the connection is at parity on both ends (a strong response exists, coming from the other end of the propagation circuit).   Else, the pendulum would either get stuck at 180 degrees or rotate in one direction, breaking the nodes of the transit path to the receiver.  The receiver must connect in a node-to-node percolation manner, not breaking the “spring” of the pendulum.  Not all connections are entangled ones, but when there is a quantum entangled connection, there is enough response from the other end of the circuit to make the pendulum work in a free style way. 

This is a bit of a modification of what I recently postulated as the cause for rotation in the Wilberforce pendulum.  Most of what I stated about that aspect of propagation (that the crystal always starts the rotation in the same direction), I think is still valid.  Most transfer is heavily one-ended, but in the case of quantum entanglement, where the efficiency is so much greater (due to the hexagonal crystals used as transmitters) – the other end of the connection is sufficiently synchronized to act as a true free space Wilburforce pendulum.  Without the quantum entanglement, the propagation is a sort of half Wilburforce pendulum, a bit like a half wave rectifier circuit.  The difference between regular energy propagation and quantum entanglement is simply efficiency.

Due to the added efficiency, the quantum entangled connection is a fully operational free space Wilburforce pendulum, while regular propagation is driven in a mostly single-ended way, helped by the phase shift of the source to compensate for the lack of response from the other end.  In the case of the entangled connection, there is much higher reciprocity, and synchronization.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

 

Quantum Batteries

 

Charge your car once when you buy it, and never again until that day, fifteen years later, when you take it to the trash heap? It’s all coming in the Quantum battery. I have been postulating about hexagonal self-similarity recently, tying it into quantum entanglement, energy transfer across the aether, and the building of atoms. The quantum battery is just an extension of those ideas.

If the atom is built with the irreptile form of nested hexagonal tetrahedrons, then perhaps it is possible to build an “artificial” version of an atom. Consider that the most energy a human can get to do his work is confined inside an atom. Consider that the Hiroshima event that released so much energy all at once was a crude release of this energy in a barely controlled way. What if that energy could be leaked into and out of a quantum battery, but much more slowly. The energy might last the lifetime of the car using such a quantum battery  to power it.

The atom is the main store of energy for humankind.  A little bit of energy can be stored into molecular arrangements of atoms, and then used later (combustion of gasoline is one example of this).  This uses inter-molecular forces, rearranging the outer electron shell (valence) configuration to get a tiny bit of energy from atoms, in an aggregate way.  But, the bulk of the energy is inside the atom.  The quantum battery taps the full energy of an “atom”, rather than the outside shell energy related to (for instance) gasoline combustion.

The atomic shells of the hypothetical irreptile-tetrahedron based atoms are very dense, energetically speaking. That’s why it takes so much energy to crack them open.  This pounding of atoms with a hammer is crude and dangerous, but is what war making nuclear devices do. Peaceful energy extraction must be more subtle.

It may be possible to develop a quantum interface to tap an atom’s energy slowly.  Alternatively, we might construct a sort of artificial atom, built with an Achilles heel back door to allow easier ingress and egress of stored energy.

The study of the hexagon leads to a quantum battery.  The irreptile capability of the hexagon, producing ever smaller nested images of itself, within a hypothetical tetrahedron atom, gives rise to the quantum battery.  All energy store that is atom based is also network based, as the energy transits the topology of the crystal and the nodes it contains. 

My theory is that sub-atomically, the same thing happens.  Theoretically, the nesting continues forever, meaning there is an endless supply of transit routes and nodes to contain endless energy.  One atom could power the universe.  Not.  Obviously, there is a limit to the nesting, and it is what I call the aether plank limit.

A quantum battery would not really hold a Hiroshima level of energy.  There is a misconception about atomic energy, and how much there is inside an atom.  A thousand nuclear fusion events on the tip of your finger is something you would not feel, and not because you were obliterated.  It’s because the energy in an atom is large compared to intermolecular forces, but still relatively small.  Hiroshima happened only because there was a chain reaction involving many trillion and trillions if atoms (would use a bigger word, but nobody would understand).  So the “chain reaction” is what we’d be looking to control in the quantum battery.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge ques

The Aether’s Right Hand Rule

 

We have one rule to guide them all: the aether’s right hand rule. Over the past several years, I have posited a number of things about the aether, and its attributes and properties, how it propagates light, and other things. I started with the idea of a lyotropic aether (one that can dissolve and reform) – giving it the “structure” of a liquid crystal when undergoing the impact of a moment of light, where the aether self-structures and self assembles along the trajectory of a ray of light. 

I made this model fit primarily with the observed behavior of entangled photons, which seemed to indicate that the self-structured aether must support angular momentum.  I then observed a possible analog to the mechanism which must support angular momentum, in the form of the Wilburforce pendulum.  But, in all of this, I could give no good reason for the torsion (rotation) to exist, because my model assumed a straight forward hexagonal crystallography would sufficiently define the aether.

I thought of many things that could drive the rotation, but all of them failed the basic test of trajectory reversal. For instance, the universe has a spin itself, as it spirals outward and expands.  But this force exerts an outside influence, which fails when the trajectory direction is reversed.  I realized that whatever explained the right hand rule (at a deep physics level, not electrical theory level) – would also explain the rotation of the aether energy propagation.

Then it struck me: it’s not an outside influence, it’s an inside one.  The rotation has to do with the crystallography of the aether itself.  It’s a non-linear crystal! Non-linear crystals can be bifringent, meaning they can support multiple network node topologies simultaneously.  Such crystals have short paths and long paths (node to node).  This difference makes non-linear crystals asymmetric, and the asymmetry promotes a spin in the direction of the long-path percolations. Note we are talking about longitudinal percolations here, and not waves.

The reader may interject that this idea also suffers from the reversal problem, but it does not.  Because it is the light itself that initiates the self propagation, and self assembly, it is that light that sets the initial angular momentum (“direction”) – entirely based upon the crystallography of the built path as it is built, which is always the same, regardless of whether there is a “reversal” or change in orientation.

Since the self-building energy paths always take a lopsided-ness based on trajectory, all rotation is W.R.T. that trajectory.  This asymmetry is born of the longer path that one “node-set” traversal takes as compared to the shorter path opposite of it. The longer path loads more energy, and therefore puts torsion on the transit pathway, and the energy flowing through it.  The angular momentum will always be with respect to the trajectory, and therefore can explain the right hand rule.

For the purposes of generating an aether echo-device (Wilburforce pendulum) entanglement scenario, a magic angle of 1.1 degrees seems to be needed, or at least is very much an efficiency boosting factor for the entanglement.  This is in agreement with the idea of a staggered-structure, self-assembling aether,  because a perfectly linear lattice would tend to rotate in either direction.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests

 

Self Assembling Lyotropic Aether

Created with GIMP

So light propagation, in my view of the universe, happens via self-assembling lyotropic aether. Anything that is lyotropic is defined as something that can dissolve and reform. Lyotropic aether forms in the presence of energy, and dissolves in the absence of it. When the aether is dissolved, the energy is scalar energy. When the aether is structured, the propagation has a vector. The emanations of momentum from an atomic orb are instantaneously scalar, but within the almost non-existent percolation time of an aether level “plank” unit – becomes vectorized by the self assembly of the aether.

Throw a pebble into a pond, and watch the ripples form.  Does the “wave” have a direction?  No, it emanates in all directions.  Thus, we might consider the ripple to be scalar energy, at least on a two dimensional level.  So it is with atoms.  For an instant, the energy emanates as the energy of the pebble wave, but just as instantaneously, that wave is vectorized into rays propagating through self-assembling lyotropic aether.

A special type of crystallography defines the aether’s lyotropic nature. It is an extension of the crystallography that defines all of chemistry.  An example of a lyotropic crystal that behaves exactly according to current physical chemistry precepts is the LCD crystal of a monitor screen or television.  LCD crystals become structured in the presence of energy, and unstructured (or other structured) in the absence of it.  So, extending the concept of the crystal we are familiar with (LCD) – we better grasp how the lyotropic aether version may work.

So, inherent in my thinking, the observant reader would know, is that I do not consider the “photon” to be the elemental unit of energy. Obviously, for an atom to emanate energy in a scalar manner, subsequently instantaneously vectorized, means the elemental unit of energy is smaller than the conventional photon.  The true elemental unit of energy is related to the effective “plank” unit for aether, and not the conventional one.

The vectorization of lyotropic aether causes a medium discontinuity, or boundary condition.  Transverse waves are known to form along a boundary condition or gradient in mediums.  The ocean wave is an example.  So, primary light propagation is longitudinal scalar, instantaneously vectorized, and followed by a secondary wave following the boundary condition and helped along by refraction within the crystallography nature of the lyotropic aether.

Understanding that crystallography defines the universe, all its components, and all of the so-called “space” in between them, we can extrapolate geometric precepts to discover more about physical chemistry.  If the crystallographic nature is seen at all levels (aether/atomic/molecular) – then it seems to paint a different picture for the atom than what we’ve been accustomed to believe.  The atom, on geometric terms, seems to be implied as a type of Goldberg tetrahedron.  Special types of Goldberg tetrahedron seem to align nicely with valence electron counts in atoms, and do not need all the “special cases” to explain the interactions as conventional chemistry does.

 

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Light Creates/Grows Latticework as it Propagates

Light grows latticework in the direction of its propagation, via its percolation, and then its refraction. When entanglement is involved, light creates a superlattice in the direction of propagation. This latticework is the result of the action of the percolation of light through lyotropic aether, as opposed to the subsequently refracted transverse light energies.

This is a better way to describe two phase or two mode light, than the way I have used in the past.  I’ve been describing two-factor light as a self aligning, self propagating effect, akin to the lyotropic crystal alignment that happens in LCD monitors.  But – it’s more than just an alignment – it’s literally the creation of a lattice framework in a way analogous to the well known elemental crystallography associated with physical chemistry.  It’s just that it happens in lyotropic aether as opposed to normal matter.

The magic angle of 1.1 degrees misalignment is what creates superlattices in the types of crystals used for generating entangled photons. The same 1.1 degree angle creates a superlattice in graphene, which subsequently leads to paramagnetism effects and to superconductance. So, light in transit is not necessarily a superlattice creator, but causes only lattice alignments when the magic angle is not involved.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests

.

Atoms are Nested Super Lattice Spheres

Today I’m going to write down a bullet-pointed list of some recent thoughts, and try not to bring along any chaff …

• Atoms are nested superlattice spheres. Each so-called orbital shell is a different geometry within the superlattice. Some geometries are more efficient (hence they hold more energy). Some of these superlattices are self-similar, resolving to ever smaller geometries, which is why they hold so much energy in spite of their size. It’s because the energy network is so large. An atom is really more like a capacitor or battery than it is like the thing that academia has painted for it.
• There is no such thing as positive electric charge.  Other than as an abstraction, we could consider that there is no such thing as charge polarity: and instead there is only the presence or the absence of energy, and the direction of its flow. The polarity abstraction has served to conflate it with something that is real, when it is not.
• All energy is initially scalar.  Tesla was correct.  But, due to the lyotropic aether, the scalar energy is channelized along percolation paths.  Due to the channelization, the individual scalar “rays” each have a vector, and can transform to refracted T-waves.
• All energy momentum transit is a longitudinal percolation.  Longitudinal percolation creates a superlattice in lyotropic aether, which aligns the lyotropic aether, creating an impedance/aether discontinuity along the medium boundary of the superlattice.  This supports refraction for the secondary T-wave.
• Nature’s mode is longitudinal, as in previous bullet point.  
• Gravity is unrefracted energy percolation, coming from the surrounding universe. It is scalar in effect, even though the energy passes through myriad percolation channels in lyotropic aether.

I should explain the assertion that there are no charges – at least a little bit. We’ve had charge terminology wrong since Benjamin Franklin guessed that the electrified clouds were negative and the ground positive. Of course, it’s really the opposite of that, but my point doesn’t have anything to do with positive being negative.

Energy is energy. It doesn’t itself have any polarity. It’s just a stress-force momentum in the aether. So, we really only have one thing, or we don’t have it. We have energy, or we don’t. Dipoles have reflexive polarity, but this polarity is “having energy” versus “not having energy” – so we have only positive “energy” (we call it negative, thanks to Franklin) – and then on the other side of the dipole we have “no energy” (or more likely “lesser” energy) – and we call it negative polarity.  The idea of a center voltage of zero is simply a convention built out of the way they decided to build power transformers, with center taps.  It’s entirely artificial, and nature doesn’t really have +/- charges in it.  It has energy, and alternately, no or lesser energy.  Like water, energy flows from where it is to where it isn’t.

The vast majority of the energy in the universe is of the scalar form, albeit it comes with the overlay of the channelization effects of lyotropic aether percolation.  We see none of it, because nothing akin to “charge” appears to us except when there is an interaction with mass that results in what we perceive (or our instruments perceive) as charge.

Nonetheless, unrefracted percolated (scalar) energy has an impact on individual atoms with its force, even as it does not affect the so-called “charge” exhibited by those atoms. So, it ends up being an undetected mechanical force that is responsible for gravity.

How do we detect this energy? We have a number of means to measure the effects of gravity, but how do we more closely measure the gravity itself?  Unrefracted energy percolation is responsible for so-called quantum entanglement.  So, a device that measures how much quantum entanglement happens per unit area (say, by measuring the quantum echoes between two quantum lenses) – we might more directly measure the “gravity”.  A candidate material for the lenses would be, of course, graphene.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

The Universe is not Holographic, but it Creates …

The universe is not holographic, but it creates a hologram from its reality. I’ve always had a problem with Bohm’s holographic universe because the hologram needed a reality source. The hologram is a flattened interference projection onto two dimensions. But it is an interference pattern of real objects in a real world. So, the holographic universe made not much sense. However, the universe is indeed full of interference, and so a snapshot of that interference pattern, flattened, is a hologram. The universe creates a holographic source with its reality. In terms of reality and real objects, that doesn’t say much. But in terms of the interactions of objects, it may say quite a lot.

One can say that the objects themselves constitute a sum of interference, and thus can be holographically interpreted.  While true, the holography is a map of the interference of energy, not the energy itself.  So, the universe is not holographic in origin, but only in the resulting patterns of connections and interactions that materialize from real energy in a field of aether defined by crystallography.

Reality is a conformation of energy in the aether, and the hologram projection of that reality describes the interations of one part of the reality with another. So, reality is the source for a holographic interpretation of the universe, of its interelated parts.

The hologram shows us the connections of the reality in the universe. Those connections may influence adjoining pieces of reality in a large or a small way. The transverse wave holograph relates to connections with the least influence.  The incoherent, non-entangled quantum hologram relates to connections that have more influence than the small transverse wave influences, but less than the quantum coherent, percolated entangled energy moments that have the biggest influence.  Three different holographic representations are created.  The first is the refracted transverse wave hologram.  It is limited by the geometric resolution of the wavelengths of the transverse wave, and by the Nyquist limit.  The other two holograms are quantum holograms, which have no Nyquist limit, and infinitesimally small geometric resolutions.  They are vastly superior.  

Why are they superior?  Because they lack the overlapping patterns in the T-wave hologram.  How could they lack the overlapping patterns?  They lack the overlaps because quantum percolation filaments keep their integrity even in fields of interference.  This allows for the “teasing out” of the tiniest variations of interference in the quantum holographic representation, where the transverse wave hologram would reach its resolution limit before it was useful for many things.  With one of the quantum hologram types, it might be possible to tease out the state of things anywhere in the universe with only a small sample of the universe.  It would be a looking glass truly deserving of the name.

The human brain might be able to “tease out” certain things in either type of quantum hologram, based only upon the small geometric volume the brain contains.  I don’t think the transverse wave hologram is viable for the brain, but perhaps one of the quantum modes could be the basis for remote viewing, and ESP.  I think it’s likely that the incoherent, non-entangled quantum percolations are a weaker field by virtue of the scattering they suffer, such that they represent lesser potential for both brain connections and for generalized quantum communication channels.  The filaments of such aether pathways are not bunched. The best potential for quantum communication is direct aether filament percolation and the associated “full entanglement” of reflexive “Wilburforce Pendulum” style echoes.  The power of the coherent, entangled class of connection is mostly the result of energy that is directed within aether filaments and which possess sufficient bunching to effect complete cycles of echoes.

How could a hologram of the quantum variety be recorded?  I envision a nearly perfect sphere of graphene mesh might be what could be used, or a dome of the same material, as it seemingly would record the fullest impression of the full interference map of quantum percolations.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Percolation is Longitudinal, with a Twist

I have been covering the magic angle of superconducting and entanglement generating gr@phene in the past few posts. The magic angle, which is 1.1 degrees, is the same for superconduction as it is for entanglement generation. This puts the two phenomenon (entanglement and superconduction) on par with one another, meaning that both are classically driven mechanisms. If superconduction can be described classically, then by virtue of the common magic angle, so too can entanglement be described classically.

There is a pun in the title.

For whatever reason, aether percolation requires a 1.1 degree entry angle. The dipole moments of the originating crystal must be directing the flow of energy, but that direction (for whatever reason) needs to be biased with a slightly non-linear flow in order to induce self assembly and propagation in lyotropic aether. So, the energy becomes a tight spiral or “vortex” of percolating moments of energy-momentum in the aether.  The natural mode of this vortex is in longitudinal moments of energy, but these longitudinal moments are induced to have a very slight boucing action inside of the waveguide of the originating crystal lattice, and subsequently of the lyotropic aether.  

It is the idea of aether-scale/ atomic scale percolation that is responsible for the seeming invisibility of the energy forces that connect entangled objects.  Most lab measurement devices depend on the “human scale” macro world measurement schemes of charge, voltage, current, and such, which require a build-up of many energy moments in order to be detected at all.  The tiny circuit flows of lyotropic aether traces or filaments are undetected by lab devices built to measure built-up charges and transverse waves.

The transverse waves we normally detect with conventional equipment are directed by the waveguide of the larger cross-section of bunched filaments in the aether, as compared to a single filament, due to the well-known pinch effect and the tendency for bunching to occur within many closely-packed traces of percolating energy.  Inner vortexes tend to pull outer ones along, until a (human scale) tranverse wave can be guided by the composite alignments.  Most of the energy is tranferred by the secondary wave (the transverse wave) because the magic angle restricts the direct-flow energy to a few moments (we may call them “photons”) that are in alignment with the crystal – while the balance of the energy is transferred via the waveguide effect and the resulting transverse form. The waveguide mechanism is refraction, which creates a so-called discontinuity in the aether, and supports the transverse flow of energy. This discontinuity is directly analogous to the discontinuity that exists at the ends of resonant antennas.

Note that the base mode for propagation in the outer-band refracted transverse wave is also longitudinal, consisting of many refracted slow-c (amorphous-like) filaments whose energy is in the form of native longitudinal force. It is the larger waveguide of the composite, rather than the singular waveguide of the aether trace, that guides the transverse wave.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Tunnels in the Aether

Any visualization of the structure of the aether that involves rigidness runs afoul of common sense (at least it does for me), because light can travel in any arbitrary direction as well as any other arbitrary direction.  This seems to imply an on-the-fly structurable aether.  Some may call it self-organizing.  I think these structures are bounded by aether discontinuities, which themselves are the result of energy moments transferred in the aether (in mostly a circular fashion).

On-the-fly aether structures may be formed by impedance aether discontinuities. Aether discontinuities are boundary conditions.  Seemingly, the transit of some form of energy moment in the aether must be cause for an aether-discontinuity style of self organization that creates tunnels in the aether.  Because aether discontinuities are able to reflect/refract energy moments, created tunnels may act as coaxial transit tubes for the transmission of light. The traversal of the transverse component of light could happen as either a transverse wave or as a portion of a helical wavefront, following the self-organizing path.

Aether (coaxial) tunnels may result from the ability of discontinuities to reflect moments of energy. Discontinuities in the aether could possibly support two modes of transfer: longitudinal and transverse/helical. One could think of these structures as light transmitting coaxial circuits.

The author of YT site Theoria (which is not related to this author/site) – has in the past mentioned the idea of light coaxial circuits.

So, what is the spearhead for the propagation of light?  What is it that initiates the self organization and the creation of the tunnel? My opinion on this matter is that it’s the longitudinal component that paves the way for everything else. The longitudinal energy self organizes the aether as it goes – as the moments of that energy are transfered through it.  The discontinuity provides a transverse or rotational/helical path for the transfer of energy moments. The ping-pong action of quantum aether entanglement then follows via the reflections of longitudinal compression-rarefaction actions in the medium.

It’s the entanglement part that interests me, more so than the propagation of light, proper.  The other stuff I study just because it’s in the road, and needs to be moved before other progress can be made.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Why Bessel Vortex Beams Entangle Things

The bessel vortex beam can facilitate entanglement between its own photons and other quantum objects, such as individual photons or the photons contained by atoms and molecules.  It’s an energy-to-matter or an energy-to-energy sort of interaction, depending upon whether the moments are transverse, longitudinal, torsional, or helical.  Helical energy implies both transverse and longitudinal component moments.

Entanglement is like a longitudinal impulse laser, lasing single “photon” moments of energy between two discontinuities in the aether. The transverse energy in the beam interacts easily with matter, the longitudinal energy in the beam interacts directly with other moments of energy via the aether discontinutities that those moments manifest.

As transverse components tend to interact highly or be absorbed, entanglement may depend on a combination of the longitudinal momentum and potentially the aether-scale torsional/helical features of longitudinal wavefronts.  Entanglement may be hidden simply because most detection schemes depend on the usual transverse mode interactions of (light) energy with matter.  IMO, entanglement is entirely a Newtonian, classical physics concept.

It’s odd to think of energy-to-energy interactions, but physics has long embraced the effect via the known behaviour of trapped entangled pairs of photons.  Obviously, in such cases, there is energy-to-energy interaction, but it is via the intermediary of matter or (more often) just of the aether by itself, and more suscinctly the aether discontinuities rendered by the energy in the aether.

Entanglement and forward propagation paths may be completely separate from one another

The energy-to-matter interaction is a facet of the surface area presented by a transverse wave.  A helical or torsional wavefront may impart interaction features to both the energy within the atom and the spin of the atom, separately. Such a wavefront would be associated with the primary point-source aether-scale longitudinal momentum, and not the transverse waves, which are secondary derivative waves.  The longitudinal pulse has diminished interaction with matter, due to its lower surface area presentation (point source).  However; it is needed to create the form factor of the helical wavefront, which then can affect the spin of an atom or of its photons.

While transverse energy is often absorbed, any longitudinal momentum, including (potentially) any superimposed aether-scale torsional energy, impinges on aether discontinuities, and may be fully or partially reflected.  Thus, those moments contribute to a ping-pong action of lengthy entanglement.  The path followed by the ping-pong moments of entanglement need not remain aligned with the original path (of transverse/longitudinal/helical energy), which itself may form an entirely different vector (by, for instance being reflected from a mirror).  After the originating photons have left the source, the entanglement and forward propagation paths may be completely different.

Creating entanglement seems often to involve squeezing photon moments into very confined spaces, such as the 1D lattice of a crystal, or the small aperture of a laser borne bessel vortex beam.  But why is this the case?

The hidden nature of entanglement may be due to the longitudinal + torsional/helical features of the wavefronts involved.

In the past I’ve tried to answer this question by thinking about what components make up the system of entanglement.  Recently, my thoughts were about the bessel vortex beam, and its system of components.  It dawned on me that it may not be so much what is in the system of components, but more about what is not.

Normally, a standard gaussian laser beam will have a good deal of what we might call self interference.  If the longitudinal impulse spouts the transverse one in a self-organizing path of a tubular discontinuity in the aether, then the secondary transverse wave represents a lot of self-interference for the longitudinal component.  The interference is in the form of the secondary transverse waves.

My “Tunnels in the Aether” post describes light conduits that are like coaxial cables in the aether. These are the standard light or laser light scenarios, which involve a large amount of self interference.

What does energy transfer in a crystal do that a bessel vortex beam probably also does?  It eliminates interference.  The helical wavefront of the BV laser beam spearheads a clearing of the aether region within it, such that it may facilitate a “coaxial” return path in its center.

Entanglement is not so much about what is there, but what is not there: interference.  So, any old laser beam (or for that matter, ceiling light) might entangle things with their rays, if it were not for the fact of interference.  Any construct that eliminates the interference will enable entanglement.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Atomic Aether and the Aether Hurricane

I’ve spent quite a few posts pontificating about the larger scale machinations of the aether, and have written about various phenomenon that seemingly could be associated with it.  I’ve boiled the entire universe down to a universal elemental aether with ripples on it – ripples that we can, in an abstract sense, call energy.

But what of the atomic realm?  If the action of free energy in the aether is so simple to describe, then  the atoms that comprise matter must also follow a simple description.  We are moulding the universe of a single elemental material: the aether.

Everything turns.  Like the lyrics in the song from the sixties, everything turns.  Magnets have their vortex swirls, weather systems have their turning hurricanes, atoms have their orbiting electrons (though “orbit” is a debatable term). But you get the point.  There is a pattern in these swirls, and the aether must support them prodigiously.  When we look at magnetic force, we must be looking at a house that follows the aetheric foundations under it.

We have the aether perturbations/ripples/energy-abstractions of movement and momentum (some call this space), and we have everything else in the rest of the vast aether – all of the perturbanceless/rippleless parts of it (some call the latter counter space). What separates the two are aether discontinuities – changes in the medium’s properties that are boundary conditions of perturbances, and that reflect similarly to an impedance discontinuity.  The idea of moving ripples on the aether (in the case of both slow and fast light) – seem simple to understand as an abstraction for energy. But what of the atomic nature of matter? Can its parts also be moulded into the simple model?

What separates the two are aether discontinuities – changes in the medium’s properties that are boundary conditions of perturbances

I have the feeling that the aether underlies all of the universe.  What we perceive as energy moves (really it transfers) across the aether, but occasionally it gets closed off.  Perhaps there is some mechanism by which regions of the aether become closed off from the rest of the aether.  Perhaps a wall is created by circulating fast light, which here and there in the early universe was found in sufficient strengths to produce aether boundary conditions in the swirl – aether discontinuities (like the impedance discontinuities of electrical theory).  Perhaps these discontinuities are really what traps the energy inside of an atom.  Perhaps the electrons really do not orbit at all – and instead reflect from the boundary conditions of the closed-off regions of aether.

What could sustain the aether discontinuity?  When energy transits the aether, it produces a real-time discontinuity as it goes.  Could such a discontinuity be a semi-permanent thing in the case of energy that has been walled-off into a mass of matter?  Such a wall would need to be very dense and very efficient.  Let’s say the modulus of elasticity for the aether is such that fast light does not have infinite speed.  This seems reasonable, even though we have no proof for or against such a thing.  That means the elastic action of the aether takes time to happen.  That would also mean that the reverse process would take time to happen.  Would this idea support an almost infinitely strong and reflective wall for atomic containment?

And if it did provide such a thing, could it be used to contain fusion reactions?  The discontinuity wall need not hold back the whole of the energy of a nuclear weapon.  The fusion reaction of a single hydrogen atom produces only a trillion’th of a joule of released energy.  It’s the chain reaction that makes a nuclear weapon go boom in a big way.  Yes – it’s much more energy than the oxidation reaction of say – gasoline – but it’s not the whole warhead in a single atom – not even close.  It takes trillions of atoms in a chain reaction to effect Hiroshima-like damages.  Someone suggested that the fusing of a thousand hydrogen atoms would likely not be felt on the tip of your finger.

So, using discontinuities to hold a fusion reaction is seemingly something that is in feasible scale.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

God Whacked the Universe with His Mallet

So, which came first?  Was it the Energy or the Aether?  Anybody following my lines of thought over the past few months realizes that I’ve essentially boiled the universe down to two things: energy and the aether.  Everything is a mechanical derivation of the effects of energy against the aether fabric of the universe.

During the creation event, did God whack the aether with a giant hammer?  And if this is so – was the hammer blow so hard that all of the universe is still reverberating from it today?

If, like Tesla believed, the universal fabric of the aether is (almost) frictionless, then the reverbations would be very slow to die out.  Instead, the ripples in the aether would ping-pong around the universe, sometimes coalesced into the hard/fast light of matter, and sometimes as transient ripples.

The ripples are directed in two ways.  There are the efficient, point-to-point, low divergence longitudinal momentum shifts of fast light, and the omni-directional, less efficient, high divergence momentum shifts of slow light, operating at the meager speed of C.  But – in essence – it’s all bumps and ripples on the aether, which are reflections of the movement of the ripples themselves, which for the moments of its movements can be considered to be energy.  So, energy itself is an abstraction for this transfer across the aether, and below it all is yet another simplification: all is the aether.

All is the aether, different here and there only by the slight manifestations of its twists and turns.  I started with quantum mechanic’s myriad particles, and soon discarded those ideas.  I boiled the maple syrup of what I thought the ingredients really were, getting down to the soft tack stage of the aether, energy, and matter.  Additional hard syrup boiling produced only aether and energy, and finally at the molasses state we have pure aether.  God had a simple task.  He only needed a one ingredient universe, and then it was a simple thing (for him) to whack it with his giant mallet.  We still listen to the music from that event billions of year on …

After he whacked the aether with his hammer, His job was done.  No more energy needed ever be added to the universe, because its frictionless design loses none.  The conservation laws (of energy, of momentum) are a tribute to this ultra-efficient aether, one-ingredient universe.

The twists and turns of the constantly excited universal aether can be manifested in many ways.  It is able to segregate itself into partitions, to make atoms and molecules.  Perhaps, the atom’s parts are confined by the medium discontinuities of the twisting, pulsating aether.  So, there are walls in the aether, that go to explain the universal divisors that break it up into a perception of matter, of energy, and of myriad details associated with that.  Yet, at its core it is all bumps and ripples …

Is a one-ingredient universe such an outrageous idea?  Let’s take the example of concrete.  Let’s consider that it’s really one ingredient (even though we know it’s a few indgredients).  But, it’s moldable and malleable, and can make many things.  So it is with the aether.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Why Light Never Stands Still

There is the old saying that rust never sleeps.  Well, light never stops.  In the atomist’s viewpoint of the world, there is not really a pat answer for why light ceaselessly moves.  But, to an aetherist, it’s a simple thing to understand.  To the aetherist, all the universe is a 3D fabric of aether, with elastic movements within it.  These movements started with the big bang, and continue to this day.  All that ever happens is that the elastic bumps within the aether medium shift around from one place to another.  They are always conserved, and the total universe is always in equilibrium.

The movements of light in the aether are thumps on the structure of the aether, and once those momentum movements have been instigated by a shove on a granule of the aether (a “granule” is what J. Yee calls the smallest elemental piece of the aether fabric) – then there is a corresponding movement (really a momentum transfer) to the other side of the granule.  The movements are not continuous movements, but instead a bump-bump-bump type of transfer.

Light that doesn’t move, by definition, doesn’t exist

When two opposing bumps collide, there is a bigger deformation of a single granule, but all of the energy of that collision is released back onto adjacent granules, because the aether absorbs nothing in the collision that it does not immediately release in the same form.  It is perfectly elastic.  Such an elastic return of the condition of the mesh will happen unless the first bump is immediately followed by a second bump, so the bigger deformations that are seen are a kind of slight of hand.  The light keeps moving.

This is different than is the case with matter, where the collisions are not perfectly elastic.  Matter can keep its deformations, and matter can stop (at least relativistically).

The light (which is a bump/ which is energy/ which is momentum) never stops.  If light were ever to stop, it would not be elastically deforming the aether, and so the bump that is the representation of light would not any longer exist.  The light would disappear from the universe.  That doesn’t happen, because the energy (of the pseudo-movement of the transfer of momentum) is always conserved.  It just goes somewhere else, instead of disappearing.  This is because the aether itself absorbs no energy that is not immediately released again.

This happens because we have defined the light to be a bump on the aether.  But, we mean by that statement that light is a transfer within the aether.  It is a bump-bump-bump style of movement. It is momentum transfer.  So, by definition, we say that light is movement (in bits), and light that doesn’t move, by definition, doesn’t exist.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Atomic Bubbles: Built with Angular Momentum?

 The past couple posts could be retitled to “The flopping fish, part one and part two” – because I’ve flopped around quite a bit in the descriptions I’ve put inside of them.  Normally, I can grab onto an idea and flesh it out with more strength and consistency (even if it’s a pretty wild idea), but building a spherical aether discontinuity within which to contain an atom’s contents have me flopping about on the beach.

To build a spherical shell of aether discontinuity, we envision a boundary surface area, agitated in some way by one or another type of energy.   Most ideas relative to “making the energy go round and round” are not very solid feeling.  But, another type of circular feature – angular momentum – already has a firm footing in the physics of optics and lasers.

The wavelength width of a laser beam is huge in comparison to an atom.  Wavelengths of transverse light for lasers are typically in the area of 500 nanometers, which abolutely dwarfs the size of an atom.  So, building a spherical aether discontinuity from an “angular momentum machine” seems right in one way – which is that the product fits inside the machine.

Laser borne bessel vortex beams may be the parts of such an atom producing machine.  Observing the output of such a laser apparatus shows what appear to be flying smoke rings, indicating that all sorts of angular and longitudinal momentums are twisted into the wavefront.

Why so much flopping around?  I once worked in a semiconductor wafer fab plant.  The theorists would come into the room, sit down, and run through the theory.  “Maybe this will fix your problem,” they might say.  But usually the maybe fix didn’t work.  Back in the day, semicon was a black art.  I wasn’t directly aligned with the physics of the job (mine was more about quality and computer programming) – but I did have a spot in the QA feedback loop that let me watch the black art fixes in action.

There was a lot of quantum in building chip wafers.  Now maybe I’d say, “There was a lot of aether.”

The black art fix was implemented by forming a brainstorm session which solicited any ideas that popped into our heads.  The whole group would do this, including myself.  The boss would say, “Anything that pops into your head, say it.”  No reservations.  No worries about it being stupid.  We covered blackboards in that fashion.

We always fixed the problem.

So it is with the aetherists.  I know it’s not an official term, but I think there are a bunch of us out there.  We have some pretty esoteric (crazy sounding) theories, but we like to splash them onto the board.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Bubbles: The View from Within

Some of us remember the 500 word essay we wrote in grade school; the one we wrote for talking in class – and the one for which the insides of a ping-pong ball was the proscribed subject matter.

The task of building the entire universe out of one thing is about the same.

In our last 500 word essay, we wrote of bubbles in the aether, and of circularly driven hard (and probably fast) light energy, (note that hard light term comes from the Theoria YT channel and refers to extremely high energy “light”. He is not affiliated with this site, but I agree with some of his precepts. I have been describing a pretty esoteric view of the universe. Splitting energy into fast/hard and slow/soft light gives us some leeway with regard to building a molecular model out of aether (and nothing else).

If indeed the idea of light-speed particles orbiting anything (under normal conditions) is as absurd as it sounds, then the aether view of the bubble of an atom, with its aether discontinuity shell, may be an upgrade in the thoughts about the matter.  Having a two speed light, each speed with different interaction capabilities (i.e., with matter, with energy, with aether) – gives us some construction help in the building of atoms with internals like “electrons” and a “nucleus” and a bunch of “photons”.  Each may serve as an abstraction for bumps in the aether, some condensed and circular, some uncondensed and line-like.

We know the constants in the periodic table do work

We know the constants in the periodic table do work.  They work to build molecules of atoms in a very logical way.   But, the constants themselves can be derived in many theoretical ways.  There is more than one way to build a constant conceptually, and some other concepts may be wrong.  The current model is not necessarily correct, simply because it produces constants of the correct magnitude.  The vector may be wrong.

So, what about the insides of a ping-pong ball aether bubble?  It must have something that mimicks levels, or at least that is an intuitive thing to think.   There are a couple ways to conceive this, right off hand.  There are some other folks on the YT channels (FractalWoman comes to mind) – that subscribe to the idea of standing waves as “particles” and travelling waves as “energy”.  To a great extent, I think that is good reasoning in an aether-only restricted universe. We need to use every angle we can get our hands on.

The waves are reflected from the aether discontinuity shell.

But, standing waves are built from forward and reflected waves.  Note the latter term.  The reverse wave kinda has to be reflected from something.  This is where I step in.  The waves are reflected from the aether discontinuity shell.  Inside of the shell, the forward and reflected waves could create standing waves, and (as the YT lady says) – represent “electrons”.  How could energy transit the barrier of the aether shell discontinuity?  Hard/fast light and slow light have different interaction capabilities, as mentioned earlier.  One could interact, while the other did not.

OK, so we have an aether shell and some electrons.  Let’s put the nucleus aside for the moment.  How do we interact our ping-pong ball bubble with others, so as to create molecular compounds?

There is the subject of surface waves.  Our favorite YT lady has pontificated upon these in great extent.  These waves can produce (at the surface/interface of aether discontinuities) either attraction or dis-attraction (where the former is a type of low pressure mediation).   In that idea could be our molecule builder.

In Genesis it’s written that God moulded the universe.  How convenient it may be that the single ingredient of  the aether was His clay.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.