Light Creates/Grows Latticework as it Propagates

Light grows latticework in the direction of its propagation, via its percolation, and then its refraction. When entanglement is involved, light creates a superlattice in the direction of propagation. This latticework is the result of the action of the percolation of light through lyotropic aether, as opposed to the subsequently refracted transverse light energies.

This is a better way to describe two phase or two mode light, than the way I have used in the past.  I’ve been describing two-factor light as a self aligning, self propagating effect, akin to the lyotropic crystal alignment that happens in LCD monitors.  But – it’s more than just an alignment – it’s literally the creation of a lattice framework in a way analogous to the well known elemental crystallography associated with physical chemistry.  It’s just that it happens in lyotropic aether as opposed to normal matter.

The magic angle of 1.1 degrees misalignment is what creates superlattices in the types of crystals used for generating entangled photons. The same 1.1 degree angle creates a superlattice in graphene, which subsequently leads to paramagnetism effects and to superconductance. So, light in transit is not necessarily a superlattice creator, but causes only lattice alignments when the magic angle is not involved.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests

.

Atoms are Nested Super Lattice Spheres

Today I’m going to write down a bullet-pointed list of some recent thoughts, and try not to bring along any chaff …

  • Atoms are nested superlattice spheres. Each so-called orbital shell is a different geometry within the superlattice. Some geometries are more efficient (hence they hold more energy). Some of these superlattices are self-similar, resolving to ever smaller geometries, which is why they hold so much energy in spite of their size. It’s because the energy network is so large. An atom is really more like a capacitor or battery than it is like the thing that academia has painted for it.
  • There is no such thing as positive electric charge.  Other than as an abstraction, we could consider that there is no such thing as charge polarity: and instead there is only the presence or the absence of energy, and the direction of its flow. The polarity abstraction has served to conflate it with something that is real, when it is not.
  • All energy is initially scalar.  Tesla was correct.  But, due to the lyotropic aether, the scalar energy is channelized along percolation paths.  Due to the channelization, the individual scalar “rays” each have a vector, and can transform to refracted T-waves.
  • All energy momentum transit is a longitudinal percolation.  Longitudinal percolation creates a superlattice in lyotropic aether, which aligns the lyotropic aether, creating an impedance/aether discontinuity along the medium boundary of the superlattice.  This supports refraction for the secondary T-wave.
  • Nature’s mode is longitudinal, as in previous bullet point.  
  • Gravity is unrefracted energy percolation, coming from the surrounding universe. It is scalar in effect, even though the energy passes through myriad percolation channels in lyotropic aether.

I should explain the assertion that there are no charges – at least a little bit. We’ve had charge terminology wrong since Benjamin Franklin guessed that the electrified clouds were negative and the ground positive. Of course, it’s really the opposite of that, but my point doesn’t have anything to do with positive being negative.

Energy is energy. It doesn’t itself have any polarity. It’s just a stress-force momentum in the aether. So, we really only have one thing, or we don’t have it. We have energy, or we don’t. Dipoles have reflexive polarity, but this polarity is “having energy” versus “not having energy” – so we have only positive “energy” (we call it negative, thanks to Franklin) – and then on the other side of the dipole we have “no energy” (or more likely “lesser” energy) – and we call it negative polarity.  The idea of a center voltage of zero is simply a convention built out of the way they decided to build power transformers, with center taps.  It’s entirely artificial, and nature doesn’t really have +/- charges in it.  It has energy, and alternately, no or lesser energy.  Like water, energy flows from where it is to where it isn’t.

The vast majority of the energy in the universe is of the scalar form, albeit it comes with the overlay of the channelization effects of lyotropic aether percolation.  We see none of it, because nothing akin to “charge” appears to us except when there is an interaction with mass that results in what we perceive (or our instruments perceive) as charge.

Nonetheless, unrefracted percolated (scalar) energy has an impact on individual atoms with its force, even as it does not affect the so-called “charge” exhibited by those atoms. So, it ends up being an undetected mechanical force that is responsible for gravity.

How do we detect this energy? We have a number of means to measure the effects of gravity, but how do we more closely measure the gravity itself?  Unrefracted energy percolation is responsible for so-called quantum entanglement.  So, a device that measures how much quantum entanglement happens per unit area (say, by measuring the quantum echoes between two quantum lenses) – we might more directly measure the “gravity”.  A candidate material for the lenses would be, of course, graphene.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

The Universe is not Holographic, but it Creates …

The universe is not holographic, but it creates a hologram from its reality. I’ve always had a problem with Bohm’s holographic universe because the hologram needed a reality source. The hologram is a flattened interference projection onto two dimensions. But it is an interference pattern of real objects in a real world. So, the holographic universe made not much sense. However, the universe is indeed full of interference, and so a snapshot of that interference pattern, flattened, is a hologram. The universe creates a holographic source with its reality. In terms of reality and real objects, that doesn’t say much. But in terms of the interactions of objects, it may say quite a lot.

One can say that the objects themselves constitute a sum of interference, and thus can be holographically interpreted.  While true, the holography is a map of the interference of energy, not the energy itself.  So, the universe is not holographic in origin, but only in the resulting patterns of connections and interactions that materialize from real energy in a field of aether defined by crystallography.

Reality is a conformation of energy in the aether, and the hologram projection of that reality describes the interations of one part of the reality with another. So, reality is the source for a holographic interpretation of the universe, of its interelated parts.

The hologram shows us the connections of the reality in the universe. Those connections may influence adjoining pieces of reality in a large or a small way. The transverse wave holograph relates to connections with the least influence.  The incoherent, non-entangled quantum hologram relates to connections that have more influence than the small transverse wave influences, but less than the quantum coherent, percolated entangled energy moments that have the biggest influence.  Three different holographic representations are created.  The first is the refracted transverse wave hologram.  It is limited by the geometric resolution of the wavelengths of the transverse wave, and by the Nyquist limit.  The other two holograms are quantum holograms, which have no Nyquist limit, and infinitesimally small geometric resolutions.  They are vastly superior.  

Why are they superior?  Because they lack the overlapping patterns in the T-wave hologram.  How could they lack the overlapping patterns?  They lack the overlaps because quantum percolation filaments keep their integrity even in fields of interference.  This allows for the “teasing out” of the tiniest variations of interference in the quantum holographic representation, where the transverse wave hologram would reach its resolution limit before it was useful for many things.  With one of the quantum hologram types, it might be possible to tease out the state of things anywhere in the universe with only a small sample of the universe.  It would be a looking glass truly deserving of the name.

The human brain might be able to “tease out” certain things in either type of quantum hologram, based only upon the small geometric volume the brain contains.  I don’t think the transverse wave hologram is viable for the brain, but perhaps one of the quantum modes could be the basis for remote viewing, and ESP.  I think it’s likely that the incoherent, non-entangled quantum percolations are a weaker field by virtue of the scattering they suffer, such that they represent lesser potential for both brain connections and for generalized quantum communication channels.  The filaments of such aether pathways are not bunched. The best potential for quantum communication is direct aether filament percolation and the associated “full entanglement” of reflexive “Wilburforce Pendulum” style echoes.  The power of the coherent, entangled class of connection is mostly the result of energy that is directed within aether filaments and which possess sufficient bunching to effect complete cycles of echoes.

How could a hologram of the quantum variety be recorded?  I envision a nearly perfect sphere of graphene mesh might be what could be used, or a dome of the same material, as it seemingly would record the fullest impression of the full interference map of quantum percolations.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Percolation is Longitudinal, with a Twist

I have been covering the magic angle of superconducting and entanglement generating gr@phene in the past few posts. The magic angle, which is 1.1 degrees, is the same for superconduction as it is for entanglement generation. This puts the two phenomenon (entanglement and superconduction) on par with one another, meaning that both are classically driven mechanisms. If superconduction can be described classically, then by virtue of the common magic angle, so too can entanglement be described classically.

There is a pun in the title.

For whatever reason, aether percolation requires a 1.1 degree entry angle. The dipole moments of the originating crystal must be directing the flow of energy, but that direction (for whatever reason) needs to be biased with a slightly non-linear flow in order to induce self assembly and propagation in lyotropic aether. So, the energy becomes a tight spiral or “vortex” of percolating moments of energy-momentum in the aether.  The natural mode of this vortex is in longitudinal moments of energy, but these longitudinal moments are induced to have a very slight boucing action inside of the waveguide of the originating crystal lattice, and subsequently of the lyotropic aether.  

It is the idea of aether-scale/ atomic scale percolation that is responsible for the seeming invisibility of the energy forces that connect entangled objects.  Most lab measurement devices depend on the “human scale” macro world measurement schemes of charge, voltage, current, and such, which require a build-up of many energy moments in order to be detected at all.  The tiny circuit flows of lyotropic aether traces or filaments are undetected by lab devices built to measure built-up charges and transverse waves.

The transverse waves we normally detect with conventional equipment are directed by the waveguide of the larger cross-section of bunched filaments in the aether, as compared to a single filament, due to the well-known pinch effect and the tendency for bunching to occur within many closely-packed traces of percolating energy.  Inner vortexes tend to pull outer ones along, until a (human scale) tranverse wave can be guided by the composite alignments.  Most of the energy is tranferred by the secondary wave (the transverse wave) because the magic angle restricts the direct-flow energy to a few moments (we may call them “photons”) that are in alignment with the crystal – while the balance of the energy is transferred via the waveguide effect and the resulting transverse form. The waveguide mechanism is refraction, which creates a so-called discontinuity in the aether, and supports the transverse flow of energy. This discontinuity is directly analogous to the discontinuity that exists at the ends of resonant antennas.

Note that the base mode for propagation in the outer-band refracted transverse wave is also longitudinal, consisting of many refracted slow-c (amorphous-like) filaments whose energy is in the form of native longitudinal force. It is the larger waveguide of the composite, rather than the singular waveguide of the aether trace, that guides the transverse wave.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Tunnels in the Aether

Any visualization of the structure of the aether that involves rigidness runs afoul of common sense (at least it does for me), because light can travel in any arbitrary direction as well as any other arbitrary direction.  This seems to imply an on-the-fly structurable aether.  Some may call it self-organizing.  I think these structures are bounded by aether discontinuities, which themselves are the result of energy moments transferred in the aether (in mostly a circular fashion).

On-the-fly aether structures may be formed by impedance aether discontinuities. Aether discontinuities are boundary conditions.  Seemingly, the transit of some form of energy moment in the aether must be cause for an aether-discontinuity style of self organization that creates tunnels in the aether.  Because aether discontinuities are able to reflect/refract energy moments, created tunnels may act as coaxial transit tubes for the transmission of light. The traversal of the transverse component of light could happen as either a transverse wave or as a portion of a helical wavefront, following the self-organizing path.

Aether (coaxial) tunnels may result from the ability of discontinuities to reflect moments of energy. Discontinuities in the aether could possibly support two modes of transfer: longitudinal and transverse/helical. One could think of these structures as light transmitting coaxial circuits.

The author of YT site Theoria (which is not related to this author/site) – has in the past mentioned the idea of light coaxial circuits.

So, what is the spearhead for the propagation of light?  What is it that initiates the self organization and the creation of the tunnel? My opinion on this matter is that it’s the longitudinal component that paves the way for everything else. The longitudinal energy self organizes the aether as it goes – as the moments of that energy are transfered through it.  The discontinuity provides a transverse or rotational/helical path for the transfer of energy moments. The ping-pong action of quantum aether entanglement then follows via the reflections of longitudinal compression-rarefaction actions in the medium.

It’s the entanglement part that interests me, more so than the propagation of light, proper.  The other stuff I study just because it’s in the road, and needs to be moved before other progress can be made.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Why Bessel Vortex Beams Entangle Things

The bessel vortex beam can facilitate entanglement between its own photons and other quantum objects, such as individual photons or the photons contained by atoms and molecules.  It’s an energy-to-matter or an energy-to-energy sort of interaction, depending upon whether the moments are transverse, longitudinal, torsional, or helical.  Helical energy implies both transverse and longitudinal component moments.

Entanglement is like a longitudinal impulse laser, lasing single “photon” moments of energy between two discontinuities in the aether. The transverse energy in the beam interacts easily with matter, the longitudinal energy in the beam interacts directly with other moments of energy via the aether discontinutities that those moments manifest.

As transverse components tend to interact highly or be absorbed, entanglement may depend on a combination of the longitudinal momentum and potentially the aether-scale torsional/helical features of longitudinal wavefronts.  Entanglement may be hidden simply because most detection schemes depend on the usual transverse mode interactions of (light) energy with matter.  IMO, entanglement is entirely a Newtonian, classical physics concept.

It’s odd to think of energy-to-energy interactions, but physics has long embraced the effect via the known behaviour of trapped entangled pairs of photons.  Obviously, in such cases, there is energy-to-energy interaction, but it is via the intermediary of matter or (more often) just of the aether by itself, and more suscinctly the aether discontinuities rendered by the energy in the aether.

Entanglement and forward propagation paths may be completely separate from one another

The energy-to-matter interaction is a facet of the surface area presented by a transverse wave.  A helical or torsional wavefront may impart interaction features to both the energy within the atom and the spin of the atom, separately. Such a wavefront would be associated with the primary point-source aether-scale longitudinal momentum, and not the transverse waves, which are secondary derivative waves.  The longitudinal pulse has diminished interaction with matter, due to its lower surface area presentation (point source).  However; it is needed to create the form factor of the helical wavefront, which then can affect the spin of an atom or of its photons.

While transverse energy is often absorbed, any longitudinal momentum, including (potentially) any superimposed aether-scale torsional energy, impinges on aether discontinuities, and may be fully or partially reflected.  Thus, those moments contribute to a ping-pong action of lengthy entanglement.  The path followed by the ping-pong moments of entanglement need not remain aligned with the original path (of transverse/longitudinal/helical energy), which itself may form an entirely different vector (by, for instance being reflected from a mirror).  After the originating photons have left the source, the entanglement and forward propagation paths may be completely different.

Creating entanglement seems often to involve squeezing photon moments into very confined spaces, such as the 1D lattice of a crystal, or the small aperture of a laser borne bessel vortex beam.  But why is this the case?

The hidden nature of entanglement may be due to the longitudinal + torsional/helical features of the wavefronts involved.

In the past I’ve tried to answer this question by thinking about what components make up the system of entanglement.  Recently, my thoughts were about the bessel vortex beam, and its system of components.  It dawned on me that it may not be so much what is in the system of components, but more about what is not.

Normally, a standard gaussian laser beam will have a good deal of what we might call self interference.  If the longitudinal impulse spouts the transverse one in a self-organizing path of a tubular discontinuity in the aether, then the secondary transverse wave represents a lot of self-interference for the longitudinal component.  The interference is in the form of the secondary transverse waves.

My “Tunnels in the Aether” post describes light conduits that are like coaxial cables in the aether. These are the standard light or laser light scenarios, which involve a large amount of self interference.

What does energy transfer in a crystal do that a bessel vortex beam probably also does?  It eliminates interference.  The helical wavefront of the BV laser beam spearheads a clearing of the aether region within it, such that it may facilitate a “coaxial” return path in its center.

Entanglement is not so much about what is there, but what is not there: interference.  So, any old laser beam (or for that matter, ceiling light) might entangle things with their rays, if it were not for the fact of interference.  Any construct that eliminates the interference will enable entanglement.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Atomic Aether and the Aether Hurricane

I’ve spent quite a few posts pontificating about the larger scale machinations of the aether, and have written about various phenomenon that seemingly could be associated with it.  I’ve boiled the entire universe down to a universal elemental aether with ripples on it – ripples that we can, in an abstract sense, call energy.

But what of the atomic realm?  If the action of free energy in the aether is so simple to describe, then  the atoms that comprise matter must also follow a simple description.  We are moulding the universe of a single elemental material: the aether.

Everything turns.  Like the lyrics in the song from the sixties, everything turns.  Magnets have their vortex swirls, weather systems have their turning hurricanes, atoms have their orbiting electrons (though “orbit” is a debatable term). But you get the point.  There is a pattern in these swirls, and the aether must support them prodigiously.  When we look at magnetic force, we must be looking at a house that follows the aetheric foundations under it.

We have the aether perturbations/ripples/energy-abstractions of movement and momentum (some call this space), and we have everything else in the rest of the vast aether – all of the perturbanceless/rippleless parts of it (some call the latter counter space). What separates the two are aether discontinuities – changes in the medium’s properties that are boundary conditions of perturbances, and that reflect similarly to an impedance discontinuity.  The idea of moving ripples on the aether (in the case of both slow and fast light) – seem simple to understand as an abstraction for energy. But what of the atomic nature of matter? Can its parts also be moulded into the simple model?

What separates the two are aether discontinuities – changes in the medium’s properties that are boundary conditions of perturbances

I have the feeling that the aether underlies all of the universe.  What we perceive as energy moves (really it transfers) across the aether, but occasionally it gets closed off.  Perhaps there is some mechanism by which regions of the aether become closed off from the rest of the aether.  Perhaps a wall is created by circulating fast light, which here and there in the early universe was found in sufficient strengths to produce aether boundary conditions in the swirl – aether discontinuities (like the impedance discontinuities of electrical theory).  Perhaps these discontinuities are really what traps the energy inside of an atom.  Perhaps the electrons really do not orbit at all – and instead reflect from the boundary conditions of the closed-off regions of aether.

What could sustain the aether discontinuity?  When energy transits the aether, it produces a real-time discontinuity as it goes.  Could such a discontinuity be a semi-permanent thing in the case of energy that has been walled-off into a mass of matter?  Such a wall would need to be very dense and very efficient.  Let’s say the modulus of elasticity for the aether is such that fast light does not have infinite speed.  This seems reasonable, even though we have no proof for or against such a thing.  That means the elastic action of the aether takes time to happen.  That would also mean that the reverse process would take time to happen.  Would this idea support an almost infinitely strong and reflective wall for atomic containment?

And if it did provide such a thing, could it be used to contain fusion reactions?  The discontinuity wall need not hold back the whole of the energy of a nuclear weapon.  The fusion reaction of a single hydrogen atom produces only a trillion’th of a joule of released energy.  It’s the chain reaction that makes a nuclear weapon go boom in a big way.  Yes – it’s much more energy than the oxidation reaction of say – gasoline – but it’s not the whole warhead in a single atom – not even close.  It takes trillions of atoms in a chain reaction to effect Hiroshima-like damages.  Someone suggested that the fusing of a thousand hydrogen atoms would likely not be felt on the tip of your finger.

So, using discontinuities to hold a fusion reaction is seemingly something that is in feasible scale.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

God Whacked the Universe with His Mallet

So, which came first?  Was it the Energy or the Aether?  Anybody following my lines of thought over the past few months realizes that I’ve essentially boiled the universe down to two things: energy and the aether.  Everything is a mechanical derivation of the effects of energy against the aether fabric of the universe.

During the creation event, did God whack the aether with a giant hammer?  And if this is so – was the hammer blow so hard that all of the universe is still reverberating from it today?

If, like Tesla believed, the universal fabric of the aether is (almost) frictionless, then the reverbations would be very slow to die out.  Instead, the ripples in the aether would ping-pong around the universe, sometimes coalesced into the hard/fast light of matter, and sometimes as transient ripples.

The ripples are directed in two ways.  There are the efficient, point-to-point, low divergence longitudinal momentum shifts of fast light, and the omni-directional, less efficient, high divergence momentum shifts of slow light, operating at the meager speed of C.  But – in essence – it’s all bumps and ripples on the aether, which are reflections of the movement of the ripples themselves, which for the moments of its movements can be considered to be energy.  So, energy itself is an abstraction for this transfer across the aether, and below it all is yet another simplification: all is the aether.

All is the aether, different here and there only by the slight manifestations of its twists and turns.  I started with quantum mechanic’s myriad particles, and soon discarded those ideas.  I boiled the maple syrup of what I thought the ingredients really were, getting down to the soft tack stage of the aether, energy, and matter.  Additional hard syrup boiling produced only aether and energy, and finally at the molasses state we have pure aether.  God had a simple task.  He only needed a one ingredient universe, and then it was a simple thing (for him) to whack it with his giant mallet.  We still listen to the music from that event billions of year on …

After he whacked the aether with his hammer, His job was done.  No more energy needed ever be added to the universe, because its frictionless design loses none.  The conservation laws (of energy, of momentum) are a tribute to this ultra-efficient aether, one-ingredient universe.

The twists and turns of the constantly excited universal aether can be manifested in many ways.  It is able to segregate itself into partitions, to make atoms and molecules.  Perhaps, the atom’s parts are confined by the medium discontinuities of the twisting, pulsating aether.  So, there are walls in the aether, that go to explain the universal divisors that break it up into a perception of matter, of energy, and of myriad details associated with that.  Yet, at its core it is all bumps and ripples …

Is a one-ingredient universe such an outrageous idea?  Let’s take the example of concrete.  Let’s consider that it’s really one ingredient (even though we know it’s a few indgredients).  But, it’s moldable and malleable, and can make many things.  So it is with the aether.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Why Light Never Stands Still

There is the old saying that rust never sleeps.  Well, light never stops.  In the atomist’s viewpoint of the world, there is not really a pat answer for why light ceaselessly moves.  But, to an aetherist, it’s a simple thing to understand.  To the aetherist, all the universe is a 3D fabric of aether, with elastic movements within it.  These movements started with the big bang, and continue to this day.  All that ever happens is that the elastic bumps within the aether medium shift around from one place to another.  They are always conserved, and the total universe is always in equilibrium.

The movements of light in the aether are thumps on the structure of the aether, and once those momentum movements have been instigated by a shove on a granule of the aether (a “granule” is what J. Yee calls the smallest elemental piece of the aether fabric) – then there is a corresponding movement (really a momentum transfer) to the other side of the granule.  The movements are not continuous movements, but instead a bump-bump-bump type of transfer.

Light that doesn’t move, by definition, doesn’t exist

When two opposing bumps collide, there is a bigger deformation of a single granule, but all of the energy of that collision is released back onto adjacent granules, because the aether absorbs nothing in the collision that it does not immediately release in the same form.  It is perfectly elastic.  Such an elastic return of the condition of the mesh will happen unless the first bump is immediately followed by a second bump, so the bigger deformations that are seen are a kind of slight of hand.  The light keeps moving.

This is different than is the case with matter, where the collisions are not perfectly elastic.  Matter can keep its deformations, and matter can stop (at least relativistically).

The light (which is a bump/ which is energy/ which is momentum) never stops.  If light were ever to stop, it would not be elastically deforming the aether, and so the bump that is the representation of light would not any longer exist.  The light would disappear from the universe.  That doesn’t happen, because the energy (of the pseudo-movement of the transfer of momentum) is always conserved.  It just goes somewhere else, instead of disappearing.  This is because the aether itself absorbs no energy that is not immediately released again.

This happens because we have defined the light to be a bump on the aether.  But, we mean by that statement that light is a transfer within the aether.  It is a bump-bump-bump style of movement. It is momentum transfer.  So, by definition, we say that light is movement (in bits), and light that doesn’t move, by definition, doesn’t exist.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Atomic Bubbles: Built with Angular Momentum?

 The past couple posts could be retitled to “The flopping fish, part one and part two” – because I’ve flopped around quite a bit in the descriptions I’ve put inside of them.  Normally, I can grab onto an idea and flesh it out with more strength and consistency (even if it’s a pretty wild idea), but building a spherical aether discontinuity within which to contain an atom’s contents have me flopping about on the beach.

To build a spherical shell of aether discontinuity, we envision a boundary surface area, agitated in some way by one or another type of energy.   Most ideas relative to “making the energy go round and round” are not very solid feeling.  But, another type of circular feature – angular momentum – already has a firm footing in the physics of optics and lasers.

The wavelength width of a laser beam is huge in comparison to an atom.  Wavelengths of transverse light for lasers are typically in the area of 500 nanometers, which abolutely dwarfs the size of an atom.  So, building a spherical aether discontinuity from an “angular momentum machine” seems right in one way – which is that the product fits inside the machine.

Laser borne bessel vortex beams may be the parts of such an atom producing machine.  Observing the output of such a laser apparatus shows what appear to be flying smoke rings, indicating that all sorts of angular and longitudinal momentums are twisted into the wavefront.

Why so much flopping around?  I once worked in a semiconductor wafer fab plant.  The theorists would come into the room, sit down, and run through the theory.  “Maybe this will fix your problem,” they might say.  But usually the maybe fix didn’t work.  Back in the day, semicon was a black art.  I wasn’t directly aligned with the physics of the job (mine was more about quality and computer programming) – but I did have a spot in the QA feedback loop that let me watch the black art fixes in action.

There was a lot of quantum in building chip wafers.  Now maybe I’d say, “There was a lot of aether.”

The black art fix was implemented by forming a brainstorm session which solicited any ideas that popped into our heads.  The whole group would do this, including myself.  The boss would say, “Anything that pops into your head, say it.”  No reservations.  No worries about it being stupid.  We covered blackboards in that fashion.

We always fixed the problem.

So it is with the aetherists.  I know it’s not an official term, but I think there are a bunch of us out there.  We have some pretty esoteric (crazy sounding) theories, but we like to splash them onto the board.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Aether Bubbles: The View from Within

Some of us remember the 500 word essay we wrote in grade school; the one we wrote for talking in class – and the one for which the insides of a ping-pong ball was the proscribed subject matter.

The task of building the entire universe out of one thing is about the same.

In our last 500 word essay, we wrote of bubbles in the aether, and of circularly driven hard (and probably fast) light energy, (note that hard light term comes from the Theoria YT channel and refers to extremely high energy “light”. He is not affiliated with this site, but I agree with some of his precepts. I have been describing a pretty esoteric view of the universe. Splitting energy into fast/hard and slow/soft light gives us some leeway with regard to building a molecular model out of aether (and nothing else).

If indeed the idea of light-speed particles orbiting anything (under normal conditions) is as absurd as it sounds, then the aether view of the bubble of an atom, with its aether discontinuity shell, may be an upgrade in the thoughts about the matter.  Having a two speed light, each speed with different interaction capabilities (i.e., with matter, with energy, with aether) – gives us some construction help in the building of atoms with internals like “electrons” and a “nucleus” and a bunch of “photons”.  Each may serve as an abstraction for bumps in the aether, some condensed and circular, some uncondensed and line-like.

We know the constants in the periodic table do work

We know the constants in the periodic table do work.  They work to build molecules of atoms in a very logical way.   But, the constants themselves can be derived in many theoretical ways.  There is more than one way to build a constant conceptually, and some other concepts may be wrong.  The current model is not necessarily correct, simply because it produces constants of the correct magnitude.  The vector may be wrong.

So, what about the insides of a ping-pong ball aether bubble?  It must have something that mimicks levels, or at least that is an intuitive thing to think.   There are a couple ways to conceive this, right off hand.  There are some other folks on the YT channels (FractalWoman comes to mind) – that subscribe to the idea of standing waves as “particles” and travelling waves as “energy”.  To a great extent, I think that is good reasoning in an aether-only restricted universe. We need to use every angle we can get our hands on.

The waves are reflected from the aether discontinuity shell.

But, standing waves are built from forward and reflected waves.  Note the latter term.  The reverse wave kinda has to be reflected from something.  This is where I step in.  The waves are reflected from the aether discontinuity shell.  Inside of the shell, the forward and reflected waves could create standing waves, and (as the YT lady says) – represent “electrons”.  How could energy transit the barrier of the aether shell discontinuity?  Hard/fast light and slow light have different interaction capabilities, as mentioned earlier.  One could interact, while the other did not.

OK, so we have an aether shell and some electrons.  Let’s put the nucleus aside for the moment.  How do we interact our ping-pong ball bubble with others, so as to create molecular compounds?

There is the subject of surface waves.  Our favorite YT lady has pontificated upon these in great extent.  These waves can produce (at the surface/interface of aether discontinuities) either attraction or dis-attraction (where the former is a type of low pressure mediation).   In that idea could be our molecule builder.

In Genesis it’s written that God moulded the universe.  How convenient it may be that the single ingredient of  the aether was His clay.

To be continued …

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.